Hi Ludo,
qui 02 jul 2020 às 11:36:24 (1593700584), l...@gnu.org enviou:
> Hi André,
>
> Applied, but without those evil tabs that ‘guix lint’ reported. ;-)
That's embarrassing. I could swear I had removed those before sending.
> The closure as reported by ‘guix size’ is 96.7 MiB for ‘tor-clien
Hi André,
André Batista skribis:
> From ac47ba538dd5cf628b26cce05e3b15b24ca03077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Batista?=
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:20:57 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add tor-client.
> To: guix-devel@gnu.org
>
> * gnu/packages/tor.scm (tor-client): Ne
From ac47ba538dd5cf628b26cce05e3b15b24ca03077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Andr=C3=A9=20Batista?=
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 19:20:57 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add tor-client.
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
* gnu/packages/tor.scm (tor-client): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/tor.scm | 31 +
I need to stop thinking of cars and cdrs. It didn't even try to compile
again, just gave me the address on the store, so I'm guessing guile is
smart enough to see it's equivalent and does not care at all.
I'll be less clumsy next time around.
---
--- a/gnu/packages/tor.scm 2020-06-03 01:29
There was a missing space on the previous email. 'indent-code.el' did
not keep exactly the same indenting as other definitions so I did
insert spaces by hand but forgot one, so I'm resending.
Also, I've forgot to mention that the build seems to be deterministic.
---
commit: 018cffc9c9e5a5855733f
Hi Ludo,
ter 26 mai 2020 às 11:56:21 (1590504981), nan...@riseup.net enviou:
> dom 24 mai 2020 às 22:51:16 (1590371476), l...@gnu.org enviou:
> > It looks good to me overall! Some nitpicking:
> >
> > We’d rather use ‘substitute-keyword-arguments’ to augment
> > #:configure-flags without touching
Hi Ludo,
dom 24 mai 2020 às 22:51:16 (1590371476), l...@gnu.org enviou:
> Hi Andre,
>
> What difference does it make, for instance in terms of the total size
> returned by “guix size tor-client” vs. “guix size tor”?
Considering only the total size, the difference doesn't appear to be
significant
Hi Andre,
Andre Batista skribis:
> Starting on version 0.4.3.5, Tor provides a configuration flag to
> disable relay code (--disable-module-relay). Considering most
> people are running clients, not relays, I thought it would be
> nice for guix to have a client-only package definition (maybe
> i
Hello Guix,
Starting on version 0.4.3.5, Tor provides a configuration flag to
disable relay code (--disable-module-relay). Considering most
people are running clients, not relays, I thought it would be
nice for guix to have a client-only package definition (maybe
it could even be the default?). Wh
