On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:40:36AM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> OK, I changed the name to libiax2 and added the license field + comment
> from your patch.
Thanks! Pushed as 4ff2060524.
I noticed in my final review that the commit title was like this:
gnu: telephony: Add libiax2.
Our convention i
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:02:21PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> just a quick comment on the name:
>>
>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> > Upstream seems to refer to the software as "iax" "libiax" and "libiax2"
>> > interchange
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:13:23PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > Since I don't understand the fine points of these things, I ask the
> > group: can a source distribution be LGPL 2.0 and include GPL components?
>
> In my understanding
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:02:21PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a quick comment on the name:
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > Upstream seems to refer to the software as "iax" "libiax" and "libiax2"
> > interchangeably. The "2" was the closest t
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/telephony.scm (libiax): New variable.
>
> > + (license lgpl2.0
>
> In my final review, I found that some source files are licensed under
> the G
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Since I don't understand the fine points of these things, I ask the
> group: can a source distribution be LGPL 2.0 and include GPL components?
In my understanding, mixing LGPL and GPL (assuming the versions are compatible)
"upgrades"
Hello,
just a quick comment on the name:
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:47:55PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> Upstream seems to refer to the software as "iax" "libiax" and "libiax2"
> interchangeably. The "2" was the closest thing I could find to a version
> number.
notice that the tarball name is al
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:25:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/telephony.scm (libiax): New variable.
>
> > + (license lgpl2.0
>
> In my final review, I found that some source files are licensed under
> the G
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> * gnu/packages/telephony.scm (libiax): New variable.
> + (license lgpl2.0
In my final review, I found that some source files are licensed under
the GPL (no version specified) as well as one public-domain file. The
details are
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 06:08:57PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>> + #:use-module (gnu packages autotools)
>^
> Also, there is some extra whitespace at the end of the line above.
>
Oops! Good catch!
>> + (uri
>> +
Thank you for your review!
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 06:08:57PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> Attached is a patch for LibIAX, a library that is used by the Ring
>> (formerly SFLphone).
>
> Cool!
>
>> Upstream seems to use no version numbers. I used the g
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 06:08:57PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
> + #:use-module (gnu packages autotools)
^
Also, there is some extra whitespace at the end of the line above.
> + (uri
> + (string-append
> + "https://gitlab.savoi
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 06:08:57PM -0500, Lukas Gradl wrote:
>
> Hi Guix,
>
> Attached is a patch for LibIAX, a library that is used by the Ring
> (formerly SFLphone).
Cool!
> Upstream seems to use no version numbers. I used the git commit ID that
> is also refered to in the version that is bu
Hi Guix,
Attached is a patch for LibIAX, a library that is used by the Ring
(formerly SFLphone).
Upstream seems to use no version numbers. I used the git commit ID that
is also refered to in the version that is bundeled with Ring. This is
also the latest commit to libiax.
Thank you!
>From b
14 matches
Mail list logo
