Alex ter Weele skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> I agree with David that it would be good to talk to the upstream
>> developer so that the .desktop file is distributed by upstream
>> eventually. Could you try to reach them?
>
> There are
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I agree with David that it would be good to talk to the upstream
> developer so that the .desktop file is distributed by upstream
> eventually. Could you try to reach them?
There are improvements I want to make to guile-wm itself, so I plan on
talking to
Alex ter Weele <alex.ter.we...@gmail.com> skribis:
> From 91f74b1b762596527dfa9412c33e39981932fa70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex ter Weele <alex.ter.we...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 22:18:53 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Adding .xsession to guile-wm
>
John Darrington skribis:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:45:22PM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Alex ter Weele
> wrote:
> > I don't believe there is a standard, but different packages do it
>
John Darrington skribis:
> Most of the .desktop files in my store do not have the /gnu/store/... on their
> Exec= line. Perhaps they should? What is the policy here?
I think it’s best to use absolute file names.
Ludo’.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:45:22PM -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Alex ter Weele
wrote:
> I don't believe there is a standard, but different packages do it
> different ways. Under my patch, guile-wm will regenerate its
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Alex ter Weele
wrote:
> I don't believe there is a standard, but different packages do it
> different ways. Under my patch, guile-wm will regenerate its .desktop as
> part of the build process, so its Exec= should be kept up-to-date.
We
I don't believe there is a standard, but different packages do it
different ways. Under my patch, guile-wm will regenerate its .desktop as
part of the build process, so its Exec= should be kept up-to-date.
-Alex
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:07:10PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:05:27PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> Most of the .desktop files in my store do not have the /gnu/store/... on
their
> Exec= line. Perhaps they should? What is the policy here?
>
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 06:05:27PM +0200, John Darrington wrote:
> Most of the .desktop files in my store do not have the /gnu/store/... on their
> Exec= line. Perhaps they should? What is the policy here?
>
> J'
>
I can comment that enlightenment does, and slim finds it:
it
as an available wm.
From 91f74b1b762596527dfa9412c33e39981932fa70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex ter Weele <alex.ter.we...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 22:18:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Adding .xsession to guile-wm
---
gnu/packages/guile-wm.sc
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alex ter Weele
wrote:
> Manually making a .desktop is what xmonad and fluxbox do:
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/wm.scm#n244
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/wm.scm#n359
> Hence
Manually making a .desktop is what xmonad and fluxbox do:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/wm.scm#n244
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/wm.scm#n359
Hence this approach. I could also work on moving this to a patch.
Which is preferred?
-Alex
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Alex ter Weele
wrote:
> Adding an xsession to guile-wm so that display managers will identify it
> as an available wm.
I think it would be best if this were submitted as a patch to guile-wm
upstream instead, and we can include the patch
Adding an xsession to guile-wm so that display managers will identify it
as an available wm.
From 91f74b1b762596527dfa9412c33e39981932fa70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex ter Weele <alex.ter.we...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 22:18:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Adding .xsession to gu
15 matches
Mail list logo