Hello Maxim,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hello Miguel,
>
> Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>> [...]
>>> It sounds like you're already putting together the work to do it. If
>>> you don't mind doing it that would save me a lot of time right
>>>
Hello Miguel,
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Hi!
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> [...]
>> It sounds like you're already putting together the work to do it. If
>> you don't mind doing it that would save me a lot of time right
>> now... I'm quite swamped! I'd be very grateful!
>
>
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Hi!
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> [...]
>> It sounds like you're already putting together the work to do it. If
>> you don't mind doing it that would save me a lot of time right
>> now... I'm quite swamped! I'd be very grateful!
>
> No problem, I ju
Hi!
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
[...]
> It sounds like you're already putting together the work to do it. If
> you don't mind doing it that would save me a lot of time right
> now... I'm quite swamped! I'd be very grateful!
No problem, I just didn't want to end up with two reports for th
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
>
>> I haven't reported it yet, but as you can see I have a reproducer script
>> attached. I haven't seen anything in vc-code that points in that
>> direction, surely though Emacs people will have a better understanding.
>>
>>
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Hi Maxim and Christopher,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>>[...]
>> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>> [...]
>>> I figured out what was happening! The bug is *technically* in vc-mode.
>>> However, nontheless it manifested here...
>>>
>>> Here's what happened.
Hi Maxim and Christopher,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>[...]
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> [...]
>> I figured out what was happening! The bug is *technically* in vc-mode.
>> However, nontheless it manifested here...
>>
>> Here's what happened. vc-mode has some various hacks, as you can see
Hello Christopher,
CC'ing Ludovic since they had that problem as well, so might be
interested in testing your solution.
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
[...]
> I figured out what was happening! The bug is *technically* in vc-mode.
> However, nontheless it manifested here...
>
> Here's what
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> First of all I want to say sorry: I've tested this and reviewed the
> patch, and this is the second issue that already has caused, so yes, my
> tests weren't enough at all.
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>
>> Also, I hope this email i
Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas writes:
> Hi Christopher,
>
> First of all I want to say sorry: I've tested this and reviewed the
> patch, and this is the second issue that already has caused, so yes, my
> tests weren't enough at all.
>
> Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
>
>> Also, I hope this email i
Hi Christopher,
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
[...]
> I'm a bit unsure what the implications fully are with this change, but
> here was my user experience:
>
> - Did a pull using magit to guix
> - Suddenly every file I open in Guix is prompting me if I want to
>enable these dir-locals
Hi Christopher,
First of all I want to say sorry: I've tested this and reviewed the
patch, and this is the second issue that already has caused, so yes, my
tests weren't enough at all.
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> Also, I hope this email isn't interpreted as being dismissive or negative
Also, I hope this email isn't interpreted as being dismissive or negative
about what looks like it's probably a real usability improvement for
hacking on Guix! I just thought my experience indicated maybe there are
additional considerations to address.
Christopher Lemmer Webber writes:
> Maxim C
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hello Guix!
>
> I've been experimenting with the following modification to the
> .dir-locals file shipped with Guix, that allows setting per-buffer
> variables within Emacs when visiting a file in the same directory (or in
> one of its sub-directories).
>
> This makes lif
zimoun writes:
> Does that mean that the term “guix” should be in the absolute path name,
> i.e., “guix/my-worktree-name”? Or does it mean that the term “guix”
> should start the worktree, i.e., “guix-my-worktree-name”?
The latter, but this is no longer needed in v2.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https
Hi Maxim,
Thank you for working on this!
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 at 14:08, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> The only requirement for it to work reliably is that any Guix checkout
> or worktree name should start with "guix".
I have read all the thread and the comments, neither v2. What do you
mean by “any
Hello Guix!
I've been experimenting with the following modification to the
.dir-locals file shipped with Guix, that allows setting per-buffer
variables within Emacs when visiting a file in the same directory (or in
one of its sub-directories).
This makes life a bit easier, by ensuring that a Geis
17 matches
Mail list logo
