Re: [PATCH] fpm2 package derivation

2017-07-02 Thread Thomas Sigurdsen
Thank you. That also explains the error messages I got; for some reason I thought '_' was special, but of course - this is lisp, it's not weird like that. On Sun, 2 Jul 2017 11:18:47 +0200 Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > In the linked resource, you have "(lambda () ...)" on like 36 as a phase. > T

Re: [PATCH] fpm2 package derivation

2017-07-02 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
In the linked resource, you have "(lambda () ...)" on like 36 as a phase. That probably doesn't work since Guix passes quite a few arguments there (where the inputs are, where the outputs are, compilation flags etcetc). If you don't care about them, just use a variable name to hold them all (f

Re: [PATCH] fpm2 package derivation

2017-07-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Thomas, Thomas Sigurdsen skribis: > Hi, just managed to make this work, ran it through guix lint and think it > should be allright. With that said I'm more than happy for feedback seeing as > I'm a guile newbie and never contributed much to anything before (even though > my papers say I ha

[PATCH] fpm2 package derivation

2017-06-30 Thread Thomas Sigurdsen
Hi, just managed to make this work, ran it through guix lint and think it should be allright. With that said I'm more than happy for feedback seeing as I'm a guile newbie and never contributed much to anything before (even though my papers say I have training as a programmer :P ). Not sure if this