es. I hope that's correct.
Yes it is.
> From 5d1d383417992369e6fa3f81331e87471183ffc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:37:16 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bedtools
>
> * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bedtools): New variabl
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:06:15AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
John Darrington writes:
> I suggest that in the description and particularly in the synopsis
fields you
> avoid persiflage like "swiss-army knife". It doesn't add any
information, and
> only goes to i
>From 5d1d383417992369e6fa3f81331e87471183ffc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ricardo Wurmus
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:37:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bedtools
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bedtools): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 49 +
1 file
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> From c8d71da303ff6b82a30db542d382cab57a00699e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ricardo Wurmus
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:37:16 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bedtools
Ludovic mostly covered this, but I have two additional suggestions:
> +
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Since there is no install phase in the Makefile I had to write a
> replacement to copy all tools from the build bin/ directory to the
> output /bin/ directory. I don't know if it is better to explicitly list
> the tools to copy or if this should rather be done with a gl
:37:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add bedtools
* gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (bedtools): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm | 68 +
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm b/gnu/packages/bioinformatic
