Leo Famulari writes:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:11PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
>> Any remaining blocking issues on this?
>
> Pushed as 614023981!
Many thanks.
--
John Foerch
Leo Famulari (2016-07-07 20:37 +0300) wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:11PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
>> Any remaining blocking issues on this?
>
> Not really... I've been struggling to write the comment that justifies
> skipping the tests :)
Nice comment after all :-) ("Obscure test fa
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:11PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
> Any remaining blocking issues on this?
Pushed as 614023981!
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:30:11PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
> Any remaining blocking issues on this?
Not really... I've been struggling to write the comment that justifies
skipping the tests :)
Any suggestions?
John J Foerch writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:18:50AM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
>>> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
>>
>> A few final nitpicks before others make a decision about the test suite
>> ;)
>>
>>> +(arguments
>>> + `(#:phases
>>> +
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:43:55AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
>> John J Foerch (2016-07-04 06:47 +0300) wrote:
>> > A test relating to an included perl module Filesys::di fails. I hadn't
>> > intended to include that module in the package, as all I'm interested in
>> > is the
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:18:50AM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
>
> A few final nitpicks before others make a decision about the test suite
> ;)
>
>> +(arguments
>> + `(#:phases
>> + (modify-phases %standard-phase
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:18:50AM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
A few final nitpicks before others make a decision about the test suite
;)
> +(arguments
> + `(#:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure)
>
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:43:55AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote:
> John J Foerch (2016-07-04 06:47 +0300) wrote:
> > A test relating to an included perl module Filesys::di fails. I hadn't
> > intended to include that module in the package, as all I'm interested in
> > is the 'di' binary. Given that, I
> As for me, I would also disable the tests. All these handmade Makefiles
> in all sub-directories are a nightmare. I think trying to figure out
> what is needed to run the tests doesn't worth it.
>
> Also don't forget to add a copyright line for yourself in the beginning
> of "admin.scm".
John J Foerch (2016-07-04 06:47 +0300) wrote:
> John J Foerch writes:
>
>> Leo Famulari writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:13:52PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
* gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
+(arguments
+ `(#:phases
+ (mod
John J Foerch writes:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:13:52PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
>>> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>> +(arguments
>>> + `(#:phases
>>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
>>> + (delete 'configure
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:13:52PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
>> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> +(arguments
>> + `(#:phases
>> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
>> + (delete 'configure)
>> + (delete 'check)
>
> D
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 03:13:52PM -0400, John J Foerch wrote:
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (di): New variable.
Thanks!
> +(arguments
> + `(#:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (delete 'configure)
> + (delete 'check)
Did you try setting `#:test-target "tes
Hello,
Here is a package for the program 'di' (df alternative). Let me know if
anything is amiss, cheers!
John Foerch
>From 4ef5a6edba2e10a59865a6aba134d2f0532c7503 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "John J. Foerch"
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 15:08:30 -0400
Subject: [PAT
15 matches
Mail list logo
