> >From d67aa1abcbca0604f88ea98fe69e6b5c68e06cf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Feel free to ignore this duplicate patch. I sent this before I was
subscribed and I expected it to go to /dev/null when I sent the more
recent patch.
My first package. Does anyone think the build arguments could be written
more
clearly? Perhaps with modify-phases? I struggled with this part.
Also, I'm not sure if it's okay to put these comments above the patch
like this...
>From d67aa1abcbca0604f88ea98fe69e6b5c68e06cf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
