[PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
From f357eb3e00edf494430c1d2d42541b3646643a9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:16:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx. * gnu/packages/lynx.scm: New file. * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it. --- gnu-system.am | 1 + gnu

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Enge
How about putting the package into web.scm? Andreas

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Andreas Enge
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:34:35AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: It's fine with me, but what about w3m.scm, wget.scm, and gnuzilla.scm? Should these all be moved as well? I noticed wget as probably misplaced. w3m would be good in web.scm as well. gnuzilla, as a gnu project, is one that I would

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add lynx

2014-03-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andreas Enge andr...@enge.fr skribis: But all this is more an expression of taste than really argumented. So far, we have no coherent policy on which package goes into which file. Personally, I tend to regroup several packages into one file. So in the end, feel free to do as you prefer.