On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 09:29:46AM +, ng0 wrote:
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:46:34PM +, ng0 wrote:
> >> Should this then be adjusted to gpl2+ ? I took the information from
> >> their website.
> >
> > Yes, I think it should be gpl2+, since
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:46:34PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> Should this then be adjusted to gpl2+ ? I took the information from
>> their website.
>
> Yes, I think it should be gpl2+, since the source files seem to all say
> "or later".
>
I have updated the
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 03:46:34PM +, ng0 wrote:
> Should this then be adjusted to gpl2+ ? I took the information from
> their website.
Yes, I think it should be gpl2+, since the source files seem to all say
"or later".
Leo Famulari writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:21:39AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 06:24:39PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> > +(license gpl2)))
>>
>> This looks good to me. Anyone else want to take a look at it before
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:21:39AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 06:24:39PM +, ng0 wrote:
> > +(license gpl2)))
>
> This looks good to me. Anyone else want to take a look at it before I
> push it?
Looks good, although almost of the Perl files in 'lib/' include
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 06:24:39PM +, ng0 wrote:
> * gnu/packages/mail.scm (perl-mhonarc): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/mail.scm | 23 +++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm
> index c2fc1a9..9740339
* gnu/packages/mail.scm (perl-mhonarc): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/mail.scm | 23 +++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm
index c2fc1a9..9740339 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/mail.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/mail.scm
@@