On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:47:46AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> Pushed. Is there an interface other than the following command to
> verify the commits are signed?:
>
> git --no-pager log --show-signature -1
`git verify-commit` can be used to programmatically verify the
signatures of commits. I
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hello!
>
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I think it would help now if you could access the repo directly. :-)
>>>
>>> What’s your Savannah account? Please make sure to upload your current
>>> OpenPGP public key there.
>>
>> Thanks!
Hello!
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> I think it would help now if you could access the repo directly. :-)
>>
>> What’s your Savannah account? Please make sure to upload your current
>> OpenPGP public key there.
>
> Thanks! My Savannah username is roelj. I've crea
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> What’s your Savannah account? Please make sure to upload your current
>> OpenPGP public key there.
>
> Can Savannah use our PGP keys somehow?
It cannot “use” them, but it can store them, in the /
>From d8638ddcfa7357168f542f626579eba9b6c5286b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 21:18:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive module to tex.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm.
* gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to t
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
> > From fc657a31b4a52628c09a0b634c49b71cce2230bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Roel Janssen
> > Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:14:59 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex.
> >
> > * gn
On 24/05/16 19:51, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
What’s your Savannah account? Please make sure to upload your current
OpenPGP public key there.
Congrats, well deserved.
ben
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
> > From fc657a31b4a52628c09a0b634c49b71cce2230bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Roel Janssen
> > Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:14:59 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex.
> >
> > * gn
Roel Janssen skribis:
> From fc657a31b4a52628c09a0b634c49b71cce2230bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:14:59 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex.
>
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm.
> * gnu/packages/
>From fc657a31b4a52628c09a0b634c49b71cce2230bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:14:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Rename texlive to tex.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Rename texlive.scm to tex.scm.
* gnu/packages/texlive.scm: Rename file to tex.scm.
ename texlive.scm to tex.scm and stuff everything in
there (that would be TeX Live + Rubber + TeXmaker.) Thoughts?
>>From c1da9bec615cc81d6dccc75386f813459a4e14f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 01:53:20 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gn
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:59:07AM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
>> Dear Guix,
>>
>> For the lack of a better place, I created a new file for texmaker.
>> Maybe we should consider moving all LaTeX-related stuff into latex.scm.
>>
>> Here's a patch for Texmaker -- a decent
t in texlive make sense?
>
> >From c1da9bec615cc81d6dccc75386f813459a4e14f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 01:53:20 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add texmaker.
>
> * gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add texmaker entry.
> * gnu/packages/texmaker.scm: New
17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 01:53:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add texmaker.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add texmaker entry.
* gnu/packages/texmaker.scm: New file.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/texmaker.
14 matches
Mail list logo
