Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Thanks! Pushed as 7b39b7eb91112616a26a7b5de1d0d4782c83add9.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hey Mark, > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> I tested gzochi-0.10.1 by applying your proposed patch to current >> 'master' (commit 8930fe62f0) and building on armhf. Unfortunately >> there's still a problem: test_oid_strategy_allocation fails an >> assertion. See below.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hi Mark, On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > I tested gzochi-0.10.1 by applying your proposed patch to current > 'master' (commit 8930fe62f0) and building on armhf. Unfortunately > there's still a problem: test_oid_strategy_allocation fails an > assertion. See below. I've b

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Julian Graham writes: > I've made some fixes and cut a new release. Find attached a patch that > updates the `gzochi' package to the new released version. I've tested > the x86_64 and i686 builds as you suggested, and would be much obliged > if you'd try a build for armhf. I tested gzochi-0.10.1

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hey Mark, On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Either one would be fine for Guix users. However, for the sake of > non-Guix users and other distros, I would suggest making a new release. > I think it's important that upstream software releases should be > reasonably portable w

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Julian Graham writes: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> If you have 'guix' installed, you can run: >> >> guix build --system=i686-linux --keep-failed gzochi >> >> to reproduce the same build on your machine, and to leave the failed >> build directory in /tmp/guix-build

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > If you have 'guix' installed, you can run: > > guix build --system=i686-linux --keep-failed gzochi > > to reproduce the same build on your machine, and to leave the failed > build directory in /tmp/guix-build-* for further investigation. N

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Julian Graham writes: > Hi Mark, > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> This update seems to have broken gzochi on i686 and armhf. Segfaults >> and aborts occur during the test suite. > > Oh dear, that's embarrassing. > > >> https://hydra.gnu.org/build/1444785 (i686) >

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hi Mark, On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Mark H Weaver wrote: > This update seems to have broken gzochi on i686 and armhf. Segfaults > and aborts occur during the test suite. Oh dear, that's embarrassing. > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/1444785 (i686) > https://hydra.gnu.org/build/144478

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hi Julian, Julian Graham writes: > Linted, built, inspected by hand. Let me know if I've missed anything. > > From 584a3d62fe7105b90df433e460d0b6232716b1fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Julian Graham > Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:10:41 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu:

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Pushed as c8edd7e65fec92f3656cfdc4332a76a5b78e46af

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hi David, On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 5:20 PM, David Craven wrote: > I hadn't realized that you are the author of gzochi. Yep! > What I meant was that gmp end up being referenced by gzochi even dough > it's not explicitly in the inputs field. Are you saying that this > shouldn't be the case then?

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hi Julian, I hadn't realized that you are the author of gzochi. What I meant was that gmp end up being referenced by gzochi even dough it's not explicitly in the inputs field. Are you saying that this shouldn't be the case then? guix gc --references $(guix build gzochi) /gnu/store/00qwdmjrzflh0q

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hi Andreas, On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Andreas Enge wrote: > Could you comment on this? Is it not needed any more? Or does dropping it > removes an optional feature? It's not needed as a first-order dependency any more - although as David Craven notes in a separate email, it's a dependenc

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Isn't gmp already an implicit input of the gnu-build-system? It still ends up in the runpath, it's just not required to be an input.

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Hello, thanks for your contribution! On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 11:20:54AM -0400, Julian Graham wrote: > - ("gmp" ,gmp) Could you comment on this? Is it not needed any more? Or does dropping it removes an optional feature? Andreas

Re: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Should be: -;;; Copyright © 2015 Julian Graham +;; Copyright © 2015,2016 Julian Graham Should be mentioned in commit message. > - ("gmp" ,gmp) No need to resend the patch. Thank you for the update!

[PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

From: Julian Graham * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (gzochi): Update to 0.10. --- gnu/packages/game-development.scm | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/game-development.scm b/gnu/packages/game-development.scm index 0bfd0c5..ba97a64 100644

[PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10.

Linted, built, inspected by hand. Let me know if I've missed anything. From 584a3d62fe7105b90df433e460d0b6232716b1fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Graham Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:10:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gzochi: Update to 0.10. * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (g