Mark H Weaver writes:
> Jelle Licht writes:
>
>> Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
>>
>> I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
>> I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
>> (mariadb, blender)
>
> The new jemalloc consisten
Jelle Licht writes:
> Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
>
> I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
> I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
> (mariadb, blender)
The new jemalloc consistently fails its test suite on i686.
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Jelle Licht wrote:
> Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
>
> I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
> I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
> (mariadb, blender)
>
> Regards,
> Jelle
>
Hmm, that mail went out a bit too rushed.
I updated jemalloc to a newer version so it supports the sdallocx calls.
I have not yet tested them with the other packages that depend on it
(mariadb, blender)
Regards,
Jelle
2016-05-04 12:51 GMT+02:00 Jelle Licht :
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 00:09:41 +0
Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 00:09:41 +0200
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.1
* gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-estimability): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm b/gnu/packages/jemalloc.scm
index