Leo Famulari skribis:
> Right now it seems that the choices are either:
> 1) llfuse.scm (this patchset would do this)
> 2) put it in python.scm as python-llfuse
> 3) create fuse.scm and put it in there along with some other
> fuse-related modules.
For now I’d suggest #2, but after that a patch t
Thanks for your comments!
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015, at 16:05, Alex Kost wrote:>
> Ah, sorry, I read this after replying to your 'llfuse' patch. I agree
> on separating fuse module, as there are several fuse-related packages
> (sshfs-fuse, unionfs-fuse, fuse-exfat).
The reasoning behind meta-modules
Leo Famulari (2015-08-26 20:16 +0300) wrote:
> This patchset adds the Attic backup program [1].
>
> Your comments are requested!
>
> I read the guidelines about naming Python modules based on their Python
> version
> compatibility [2]. They don't seem to require changing the upstream name of
> ms
This patchset adds the Attic backup program [1].
Your comments are requested!
I read the guidelines about naming Python modules based on their Python version
compatibility [2]. They don't seem to require changing the upstream name of
msgpack-python to python-msgpack but I noticed that it was done
