Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Alex Sassmannshausen skribis: > I have tested Perl’s wrap phase, and that seems to work fine. I was > unfortunately not able to test Python’s wrap phase, as I did not know of an > appropriate test candidate (I tried to build offlineimap, but this failed > because

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Hi Ludo, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi Alex, > > Alex Sassmannshausen skribis: > >>> You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl. >> >> Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test >> this `wrap-language-programs` patch set

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Hi Alex, Alex Sassmannshausen skribis: >> You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl. > > Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test > this `wrap-language-programs` patch set against, however I have been > stuck in "Rebuild

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:02:10AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> Leo Famulari writes: >> > Changes like this will need to go on the core-updates branch, where we >> > make changes to the core of the system. >> >> Makes sense, I will push it to core-updates

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Am 17.11.2016 um 22:15 schrieb Leo Famulari: > So, changing the build systems for these languages will require you to > rebuild almost everything. We now have thee build-systems which are changed: python (branch python-build-system), cmake (branch staging, a simple change only) and perl. What

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:02:10AM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > Changes like this will need to go on the core-updates branch, where we > > make changes to the core of the system. > > Makes sense, I will push it to core-updates tonight. To clarify, I didn't read

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Hi Leo, Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> > You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl. >> >> Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test >> this `wrap-language-programs` patch

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:58:45PM +0100, Alex Sassmannshausen wrote: > > Hello > > > You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl. > > Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test > this `wrap-language-programs` patch set against, however I have been > stuck

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Am 17.11.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Alex Sassmannshausen: > In both cases, the programs work fine with the generalized patch. Fine :-) -- Regards Hartmut Goebel | Hartmut Goebel | h.goe...@crazy-compilers.com | | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Fwiw, I have now succeeded at building offlineimap, and as a result, it seems youtube-dl also was able to be built easily (presumably because they share a great number of dependencies). In both cases, the programs work fine with the generalized patch. Alex Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Hello > You may try e.g. scons, pip, sphinx, or youtube-dl. Hartmut was kind enough to suggest the above python applications to test this `wrap-language-programs` patch set against, however I have been stuck in "Rebuild the world"-hell for the last day and a half setting up testcases. I end up

[PATCH 0/3] Add a generalized `wrap-language-programs`

Hello, Following on from discussion earlier in the week, please find attached 3 patches that implement a generalized `wrap-language-programs` procedure that can be used to add a `wrap` phase to build-systems. The first patch adds the procedure, and the following 2 patches add `wrap` phase