Re: [PATCH 04/19] gnu: Add r-bh.

Vicente Vera writes: > I don't know if the boost package in the distribution could be used to > comply with the requirements. IMO it is safer to incorporate r-bh as > it is needed by dplyr. I took a look at the README file and have come to the conclusion that it is best

Re: [PATCH 04/19] gnu: Add r-bh.

>> package in place of “r-bh”? >> >> If not: please use two spaces in the description. I think the first two >> sentences can be removed as they relate to the Boost library. Also, >> please use lower case for the synopsis. >> >> ~~ Ricardo From 217d1823ee81

Re: [PATCH 04/19] gnu: Add r-bh.

> * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-bh): New variable. [...] > +(synopsis "Boost C++ Header Files") > +(description > + "Boost provides free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries. > +A large part of Boost is provided as C++ template code which is > +resolved entirely at

Re: [PATCH 04/19] gnu: Add r-bh.

Hello, I don't know if the boost package in the distribution could be used to comply with the requirements. IMO it is safer to incorporate r-bh as it is needed by dplyr. New patch with corrections attached. 2015-09-14 7:50 GMT-03:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > >> *

[PATCH 04/19] gnu: Add r-bh.

From 48779f00039194426bdd53acb81a29dc50994340 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vicente Vera Parra <vicente...@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 13:09:32 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 04/19] gnu: Add r-bh. * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (r-bh): New variable. --- gnu/packages/statistics.sc