David Craven skribis:
> I updated the license information for the packages. It's an
> improvement over what was already commited. I called it a isc derived
> license. If someone wants me to take further steps I need clear
> instructions on how to proceed. =)
In cases where a package is multiply-
I updated the license information for the packages. It's an
improvement over what was already commited. I called it a isc derived
license. If someone wants me to take further steps I need clear
instructions on how to proceed. =)
> I'm lost :) What does this mean for libtsm?
Can't we just call it an ISC license? I'm sorry I even said something
=P It's the author's responsability to select a license or not add a
license in which case it's clear that it's copyrighted. Stuff like
this is just annoying...
It says:
Permission to A and B this software for any purpose and without fee is
hereby granted.
I read this to mean that we have permission to do A and B as long as
we do it without fee. But I'm not picky so I'll go along with your
interpretation... =P
The question remains which license is this p
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:22:43PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:09:26PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:04:01AM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> > > Can I get some feedback on this email? Is it appropriate?
> >
> > I guess the email looks good. I
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:09:26PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:04:01AM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> > Can I get some feedback on this email? Is it appropriate?
>
> I guess the email looks good. I would rather ask some licensing experts
> before taking this to the author
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:04:01AM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> Can I get some feedback on this email? Is it appropriate?
I guess the email looks good. I would rather ask some licensing experts
before taking this to the author, who probably intended to release the
code as free software.
By the wa
Can I get some feedback on this email? Is it appropriate?
Hi Markus,
I got your email address from https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/.
I'm a contributor to the guixsd project, a free linux distribution. I
commited a package named libtsm. The package contains two
files (wcwidth.c and wcwidth.h) tha
>>> The new license bars us from redistributing the code for a fee? If so,
>>> does that count as free software?
>>
>>> But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom
>>> to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.
>>
>> I guess not then. It has to be removed then?
>> The new license bars us from redistributing the code for a fee? If so,
>> does that count as free software?
>
>> But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom
>> to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.
>
> I guess not then. It has to be removed then?
I cou
> The new license bars us from redistributing the code for a fee? If so,
> does that count as free software?
> But regardless of how you got your copies, you always have the freedom
> to copy and change the software, even to sell copies.
I guess not then. It has to be removed then?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:46:55PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> >> How do I figure out what kind of license they are?
> >
> > I usually do a web search on a sentence fragment.
>
> That works very nicely. Thank you!
>
> What do I do if someone removes a word from a license text? :/
>
> Permission
>> How do I figure out what kind of license they are?
>
> I usually do a web search on a sentence fragment.
That works very nicely. Thank you!
What do I do if someone removes a word from a license text? :/
Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software
for any purpose >and< wi
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:54:38PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> Ups, on the license thing, I was quick to push. If the licenses aren't
> labeled with a title, how do I figure out what kind of license they
> are?
I usually do a web search on a sentence fragment.
Here are some good resources that u
> Ups, on the license thing, I was quick to push. If the licenses aren't
> labeled with a title, how do I figure out what kind of license they
> are?
A decison flowchart would be nice... =P
Ups, on the license thing, I was quick to push. If the licenses aren't
labeled with a title, how do I figure out what kind of license they
are?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 03:53:06PM +0200, David Craven wrote:
> * gnu/packages/admin.scm (libtsm): New variable.
I think it should go in terminals.scm.
> +(license license:expat)))
Please check the source files for the variety of licenses they bear:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~dvdhrm/libts
* gnu/packages/admin.scm (libtsm): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/admin.scm | 25 +
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
index 6d88e3b..5730b5a 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/admin.scm
@@ -13,
18 matches
Mail list logo
