Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2015-06-07 18:36 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>> However it’s important to fall back to file name completions for things
>> that are not handled, so that at least it is not worse than without the
>> pcomplete code.
>
> Yes, it is the current behaviour (I mean the fi
`guix-pcomplete-use-repl' variable) to choose what a user prefers)
>> Many thanks to Ludovic for the great idea of this package!
>
> Well I’m always impressed by your productivity!
Thanks, but it is far from yours!!
>> From 9ed30b97519afad84c58f1a7166f11a5e22ecda1 Mon Sep
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> I wonder if ‘guix-pcomplete-run-guix’ couldn’t run the command in a REPL
> instead of spawning a process. That is, when completing ‘guix build’,
> it would evaluate something like:
>
> (with-output-to-string
> (lambda ()
> (catch 'quit
>
ed30b97519afad84c58f1a7166f11a5e22ecda1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alex Kost
> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:19:51 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: Add shell completions for "guix" command.
>
> * emacs/guix-pcomplete.el: New file.
> * emacs.am (ELFILES): Add it.
> *
ll be completed much faster.
Many thanks to Ludovic for the great idea of this package!
>From 9ed30b97519afad84c58f1a7166f11a5e22ecda1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:19:51 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: Add shell completions for "guix" command.
*
