On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:13:47PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> I am no perl expert, but I think it just comes with perl. Debian is easy
> to check [1].
Indeed, so I just put your patch. Thanks for your patience!
Andreas
On 18/02/16 20:16, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:59:14PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> You can find it here [1], I have also attached it to this email.
>
> Okay, thanks. I have added a "." to the tag line of the commit message
> and dropped the line "needed for vcsh tests"
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 07:59:14PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> You can find it here [1], I have also attached it to this email.
Okay, thanks. I have added a "." to the tag line of the commit message
and dropped the line "needed for vcsh tests"; we can package it in its own
right. I also mod
On 18/02/16 19:55, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:15:23PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> The commit that removes the module only makes sense in the context of
>> adding vcsh. It's analogous to adding a module that is required for a
>> new package, and that is done in a single commi
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:15:23PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The commit that removes the module only makes sense in the context of
> adding vcsh. It's analogous to adding a module that is required for a
> new package, and that is done in a single commit. So, I think it's
> better to squash the c
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 06:28:18PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 13/02/16 22:39, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:07:54PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> >> As this provides a which procedure which conflicts with the which package
> >> provided by gnu packages base.
> >
On 13/02/16 22:39, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:07:54PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
>> As this provides a which procedure which conflicts with the which package
>> provided by gnu packages base.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (version-control): Don't use utils
>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:07:54PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> As this provides a which procedure which conflicts with the which package
> provided by gnu packages base.
>
> * gnu/packages/version-control.scm (version-control): Don't use utils
I can build all the packages in version-contro
As this provides a which procedure which conflicts with the which package
provided by gnu packages base.
* gnu/packages/version-control.scm (version-control): Don't use utils
---
gnu/packages/version-control.scm | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/version-control.scm b
