Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-22 Thread François
Hello, On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:44:47PM -0400, Joshua Branson wrote: > pinoaffe writes: > > raingloom writes: > > > >> seL4 would be cool too. > So essentially most of the active hurd developers considered a port to a > different microkernel to be impractical. :( > > However, one of the mai

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-21 Thread Vincent Legoll
On Sunday, March 21, 2021, raingloom wrote: > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:42:19 +0100 > Vincent Legoll wrote: > > > + '(#:tests? #f ;; No need for tests when you have formal proof > > of correctness > In just about any talk about Idris and Type Driven Development, Edwin > Brady always starts with

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-21 Thread raingloom
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:42:19 +0100 Vincent Legoll wrote: > + '(#:tests? #f ;; No need for tests when you have formal proof > of correctness In just about any talk about Idris and Type Driven Development, Edwin Brady always starts with "you still need tests".

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-19 Thread Vincent Legoll
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 8:42 PM Vincent Legoll wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:02 PM Vincent Legoll > wrote: > > I have created a guix build recipe for seL4 recently, it builds, but I don't > > know what to do with it :-) > > > > I'll send it as a followup to this thread, if any one is inte

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-19 Thread Vincent Legoll
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:02 PM Vincent Legoll wrote: > I have created a guix build recipe for seL4 recently, it builds, but I don't > know what to do with it :-) > > I'll send it as a followup to this thread, if any one is interested. Here it is, ukernel only, hardcoded arch, nothing fancy like

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-19 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:45 PM Joshua Branson wrote: > >> seL4 would be cool too. > > Didn't someone do some work on making hurd run on SEL4? > > Or am I misremembering > > You are correct. :) It was a member of the L4 family, but I think it was not seL4 (looks like seL4 started in 2006

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-19 Thread Joshua Branson
pinoaffe writes: > raingloom writes: > >> seL4 would be cool too. > Didn't someone do some work on making hurd run on SEL4? > Or am I misremembering You are correct. :) https://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/history/port_to_another_microkernel.html By now (that is, after 2006), there were some new

Re: [SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-19 Thread pinoaffe
raingloom writes: > http://jehanne.io/2021/01/06/gcc_on_jehanne.html > > Should support more architectures than Hurd ;) > > Anyways, just throwing this out there, as I - and I imagine every > other contributor - have some more pressing projects. > > It probably wouldn't be able to run most packag

[SPITBALL] Jehanne as another kernel option / porting target

2021-03-18 Thread raingloom
http://jehanne.io/2021/01/06/gcc_on_jehanne.html Should support more architectures than Hurd ;) Anyways, just throwing this out there, as I - and I imagine every other contributor - have some more pressing projects. It probably wouldn't be able to run most packages and services without some sign