Re: [aarch64] sbcl build failure

2021-03-31 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
You can try two things: - Does version 2.1.2 work? - Can you try bootstrapping SBCL with ECL instead of CLISP? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [aarch64] sbcl build failure

2021-03-31 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:26:20AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > I'm looking at the following cl-zstd build failure: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/133326/details > > which is caused by sbcl build failure that I > > reproduced locally. Unfortunately, the build failed on the Overdrive 1000, bas

Re: [aarch64] sbcl build failure

2021-03-30 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:15:01AM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote: > I'm looking at the following cl-zstd build failure: > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/133326/details > which is caused by sbcl build failure that I > reproduced locally. During the recent staging cycle, I noticed a huge number of SBCL

[aarch64] sbcl build failure

2021-03-30 Thread Vincent Legoll
Hello, I'm looking at the following cl-zstd build failure: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/133326/details which is caused by sbcl build failure that I reproduced locally. I diffed the CI build log output with my local attempt and got the same thing modulo timings [1] and other harmless stuff. [1]