Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-05-23 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 01:48:11PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > Good news. The changelog for > > http://erlang.org/download/OTP-19.0-rc1.README > > says that > > OTP-13504Application(s): compiler > >The compiler will no longer put the compilation date >and

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-05-23 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 12:56:49PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:46:42PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:02:28PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > > I received a nice reply from Joe Armstrong. Basically he agrees with > > > the idea of deterministic bu

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-09 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 02:46:42PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:02:28PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > I received a nice reply from Joe Armstrong. Basically he agrees with > > the idea of deterministic builds and hashes for content of source > > files > > > > http://joe

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-05 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 12:02:28PM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > I received a nice reply from Joe Armstrong. Basically he agrees with > the idea of deterministic builds and hashes for content of source > files > > http://joearms.github.io/2015/03/12/The_web_of_names.html > > and will support us i

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-05 Thread Pjotr Prins
I received a nice reply from Joe Armstrong. Basically he agrees with the idea of deterministic builds and hashes for content of source files http://joearms.github.io/2015/03/12/The_web_of_names.html and will support us if we raise our issue on the mailing list. Leo, do you want to have a go - e

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
Dear Mr Armstrong, First of, thanks for the hard work on Erlang. I read your book when it came out and it is cool to see how use is exploding. My latest project is actually written in Elixir. You may have heard of GNU Guix, the modern (functional) package manager of the GNU project. We are trying

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:49:44PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > I think that the erlang-questions list [0] could be a good place to > start. Possibly, though I think it is more user-oriented. > Pjotr, would you like to start the conversation? I can do it if you are > too busy or something. I'll

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-04 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:50:12PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:28:02AM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > Debian's package exhibits this problem. The timestamps are generated in > > > the following places in

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-04 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:28:02AM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > > Debian's package exhibits this problem. The timestamps are generated in > > the following places in the source code. I don't know how to approach > > this problem. > > >

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-04 Thread Pjotr Prins
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:39:24PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Debian's package exhibits this problem. The timestamps are generated in > the following places in the source code. I don't know how to approach > this problem. > > lib/kernel/test/global_SUITE_data/global_trace.erl:io:format("The

Re: [v3] Erlang

2016-04-03 Thread Leo Famulari
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 11:26:48PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > All the .beam files have timestamps and build paths embedded [0]. This > > is a known issue without a clear solution. The build paths don't seem so > > bad to me, since my understanding is that they are se