Hello,
Andreas Enge skribis:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:32:46PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>> Sorry, I misunderstood the conclusion of the discussion: I thought that
>> we would simply follow the package naming convention as per the manual.
>
> I am confused about this statement. The namin
Hello,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:32:46PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Sorry, I misunderstood the conclusion of the discussion: I thought that
> we would simply follow the package naming convention as per the manual.
I am confused about this statement. The naming convention speaks a bit
vague
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes:
> guix-comm...@gnu.org wrote:
>> gnu: wesnoth-server: Rename package to
>> the-battle-for-wesnoth-server.
>
> My fault for totally missing the review window,
These changes were not submitted as patches, so there was no review
window.
It would have been better to
Pierre,
guix-comm...@gnu.org wrote:
gnu: wesnoth-server: Rename package to
the-battle-for-wesnoth-server.
My fault for totally missing the review window, but could we at
least drop the articles from the-long-package-names before they
become too widespread? (I'll defer to you on l-abbaye, th
