Hi,
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021 at 17:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> What I think those figures show is the amount of manual tweaks necessary
> to get a proper package “à la Guix”, with tests running etc. For PyPI
> we often need to add things under ‘native-inputs’, hence the 71%
> “different inputs” lin
Hi,
zimoun skribis:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 23:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>> $ SAMPLE_SIZE=200 ./pre-inst-env guile
>> ~/src/guix-debugging/importer-accuracy.scm
>> […]
>> Accuracy for 'pypi' (200 packages):
>> acc
Hi Ludo,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 23:57, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> (It’s quite expensive to run because it downloads a whole bunch of
> things and tries many 404 URLs in the case of CRAN before finding the
> right one.)
Ah… it requires investigation thus.
> --8<---cut here---
On Thu, Oct 28 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> As I’m preparing my PackagingCon talk and wondering how language package
> managers could make our lives easier, I thought it’d be interesting to
> know how well our importers are doing.
>
> My understanding is that most of them require
Hi Nicolas/Ludo,
On Fri, Oct 29 2021, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Among those, which importers provide source that differs from
what you’d get from upstream’s checkout or release tarballs?
My guess:
elpa (gives hosted tarballs that can differ from upstream
repo)
Indeed.
For MELPA specif
Hello!
Thanks everyone for your feedback!
Lars-Dominik Braun skribis:
> Would it be possible to just run the importer again for existing packages
> and compare the result (minus synopsis/description) with what’s
> available in Guix? That should give you much more accurate numbers than
> our gue
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> My understanding is that most of them require manual intervention—i.e.,
> one has to tweak what ‘guix import’ produces, even if we ignore
> synopsis/description/license, to set the right inputs, etc. If we were
> to estimate the fraction of imported packages for
Ludovic Courtès writes:
>go (Sarah? Leo? Raghav?)
I have only used this a few times so far, but the quality seems to have gotten
a lot better. My impression, though, due to the nature of how we have to
generate packages so as to not be reliant on a centralized GOPROXY server
(na
Ludovic Courtès writes:
Hello Guix!
As I’m preparing my PackagingCon talk and wondering how language
package
managers could make our lives easier, I thought it’d be
interesting to
know how well our importers are doing.
My understanding is that most of them require manual
intervention—i.e
Le 28 octobre 2021 03:02:27 GMT-04:00, "Ludovic Courtès"
a écrit :
>Hello Guix!
>
>As I’m preparing my PackagingCon talk and wondering how language package
>managers could make our lives easier, I thought it’d be interesting to
>know how well our importers are doing.
>
>My understanding is that m
Hi Ludo’,
> Right. PyPI/setup.py/.whl doesn’t contain info as to how to run tests,
> right?
technically setup.py has a standard test target, but it’s been
deprecated for years and it must be enabled manually by the project. I’m
not aware of any standard pyproject.toml approach to this. It might b
s not the default one. This
should get an estimation on the accuracy of importers, IMHO.
Cheers,
simon
Hi,
On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 at 09:02, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> My understanding is that most of them require manual intervention—i.e.,
> one has to tweak what ‘guix import’ produces, even if we ignore
> synopsis/description/license, to set the right inputs, etc. If we were
> to estimate the fractio
Hi!
Lars-Dominik Braun skribis:
>> My understanding is that most of them require manual intervention—i.e.,
>> one has to tweak what ‘guix import’ produces, even if we ignore
>> synopsis/description/license, to set the right inputs, etc. If we were
>> to estimate the fraction of imported package
Hi Ludo’,
> My understanding is that most of them require manual intervention—i.e.,
> one has to tweak what ‘guix import’ produces, even if we ignore
> synopsis/description/license, to set the right inputs, etc. If we were
> to estimate the fraction of imported packages for which manual changes
>
Hello Guix!
As I’m preparing my PackagingCon talk and wondering how language package
managers could make our lives easier, I thought it’d be interesting to
know how well our importers are doing.
My understanding is that most of them require manual intervention—i.e.,
one has to tweak what ‘guix im
16 matches
Mail list logo
