Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-04-11 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On sam., 08 avril 2023 at 12:28, Josselin Poiret wrote: > Should we organize a code sprint soon to bring the community together > and try and get this finally merged? I can take care of sending a mail > to guix-devel, as long as we have enough helping hands for the fateful > day(s). Nice i

Re: core-updates sprint (was: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix)

2023-04-10 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Sat, Apr 08, 2023 at 12:28:07PM +0200 schrieb Josselin Poiret: > Should we organize a code sprint soon to bring the community together > and try and get this finally merged? I can take care of sending a mail > to guix-devel, as long as we have enough helping hands for the fateful > day(s). > If

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-04-08 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hi Andreas and everyone, Andreas Enge writes: > Ludovic and Chris have corrected a problem in dune.scm in commit >01d9859821c5df6cc76c59e48fddd3c8cfa88ff0 > Now all of core-updates is being built, and the dashboard is back. > Thanks a lot! > > This means that people can now work on repairing

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-04-07 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello all, Am Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:54:23AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > > Well, it does not seem to work. > >https://ci.guix.gnu.org/ > > shows "all" under build, but > >https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates > > has a few evaluations made after the change that do not take it into

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-03-31 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:21:22PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > Well, it does not seem to work. >https://ci.guix.gnu.org/ > shows "all" under build, but >https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates > has a few evaluations made after the change that do not take it into > account. For instan

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-03-30 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:20:14AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge: > With staging built and the build farm being quite idle, I have come to the > same conclusion, so I have modified the specification to build everything, > and (hopefully) restarted the evaluation. Well, it does not seem to work. ht

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-03-30 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 03:32:07PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Yes, it looks like we can safely uncomment icecat in ‘%system-packages’. Done! > Now, maybe we’ve reached the point where we can get ci.guix to build all > of ‘core-updates’? With staging built and the build farm being quite idl

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-03-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Andreas Enge skribis: > Would it be okay to add the following packages to etc/release-manifests.scm: > openjdk > unison (exercises ocaml) > ghc-pandoc (exercises ghc) > calibre (exercises Qt5 and python-pyqt) I would maybe not add them to ‘etc/release-manifest.scm’ because that goes beyond

Re: Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-03-18 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello! Am Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 05:47:08PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > I’ve just changed it the ‘core-updates’ job to build > ‘etc/release-manifests.scm’ (you can check what’s in there). So > everything goes well (a big “if” :-)), we’ll soon have substitutes for > Emacs, GTK, and whatnot. th

Building more of ‘core-updates’ on ci.guix

2023-03-15 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! Andreas Enge skribis: > So it would be nice if someone could set up a more complete job for > core-updates on cuirass or QA, and maybe write up a how-to to see which > packages work and which ones need more love, preferably by architecture. I’ve just changed it the ‘core-updates’ job to