Hello!
John Darrington skribis:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
> Hi!
>
> John Darrington skribis:
>
> > So ... my recommendations:
> >
> > 1. We change /etc/hosts to read
> >
> >
> > 127.0.0.1 localhost.lo
Am 09.10.2016 um 11:56 schrieb John Darrington:
> But for IPv6 the loopback interface has ::1/128, this ::2 would not got
> there.
>
> So if we follow your proposal adding "127.0.0.2 gambrius" to /etc/hosts,
> we could not contently doe this for IPv6.
>
> IPv6 is som
On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 11:12:58AM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 08.10.2016 um 16:08 schrieb John Darrington:
> > 127.0.0.2 gambrinus
> Now what happens if you "ping gambrinus"?
>
> ICMP packets will be sent to the local host.
Me fool. of cours
Am 08.10.2016 um 16:08 schrieb John Darrington:
> > 127.0.0.2 gambrinus
> Now what happens if you "ping gambrinus"?
>
> ICMP packets will be sent to the local host.
Me fool. of course it does: the loopback interface has netmask /8
)defined in RFC 990 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rf
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:07:37PM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 06.10.2016 um 02:57 schrieb John Darrington:
>127.0.0.1 localhost
>::1 localhost
>127.0.0.1 gambrinus
>::1 gambrinus
>
> Or am I missing somet
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:24:57AM +0200, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
Am 05.10.2016 um 20:31 schrieb John Darrington:
> (shepherd-service-type
>'host-name
>(lambda (name)
> (shepherd-service
I suggest adding a comment here whether this is the bare hostna
Am 06.10.2016 um 02:57 schrieb John Darrington:
>127.0.0.1 localhost
>::1 localhost
>127.0.0.1 gambrinus
>::1 gambrinus
>
> Or am I missing something?
>
> Hmm. I have never seen it done this way elsewhere, and I really wonder how
> some
> ser
Am 05.10.2016 um 20:31 schrieb John Darrington:
> (shepherd-service-type
>'host-name
>(lambda (name)
> (shepherd-service
I suggest adding a comment here whether this is the bare hostname or the
FQDN.
> 127.0.0.2 gambrinus
Now what happens if you "ping gambrinus"?
--
Schönen Gruß
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 10:17:14PM +0200, Ludovic Court??s wrote:
Hi!
John Darrington skribis:
> So ... my recommendations:
>
> 1. We change /etc/hosts to read
>
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> ::1 localhost.localdom
Hi!
John Darrington skribis:
> So ... my recommendations:
>
> 1. We change /etc/hosts to read
>
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
> ::1 localhost.localdomain localhost
>
> 127.0.0.2 gambrinus
It’s not very useful to have “localhost.localdomain”, is it? Also,
shouldn’t we
Further to discussions on #guix earlier this week ...
Some of us are concerned about what we currently have in /etc/hosts viz:
127.0.0.1 localhost gambrinus
::1 localhost gambrinus
(my machine is called "gambrinus")
This is a problem becuase it means that "hostname -f" returns the wrong
11 matches
Mail list logo