Re: Cosmetic changes commits as a potential security risk (was Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits)

2020-12-19 Thread Raghav Gururajan
Hi Mark! > Thanks for the explanation. > > Please keep in mind that every comment in Guix was deliberately put > there by a Guix developer, which means that at least one developer > thought the comment was worth including. > > I'm concerned that you felt so confident in your assessment that

Cosmetic changes commits as a potential security risk (was Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits)

2020-12-05 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hi Raghav, I asked: >> Do you have an explanation for why you are removing comments in your >> "cosmetic changes" commits? "Raghav Gururajan" replied: > I think the comments are useful for non-trivial cases. In these > definitions, the inputs were propagated because they were mentioned in >