Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-18 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Montag, dem 18.09.2023 um 17:17 +0300 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler > wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > Am Sonntag, dem 10.09.2023 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Othacehe: > > > I have CC'ed members of the python, java, ruby, rust, r,

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-18 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Hi Mathieu, > > Am Sonntag, dem 10.09.2023 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Othacehe: > > I have CC'ed members of the python, java, ruby, rust, r, haskell and > > emacs teams. Any plans adding cross-compilation support to your

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-12 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > In order for Guix to become an alternative to tools such as Yocto and > Buildroot, having most or all our packages cross-compiling is a > prerequisite. > > Here is a status of cross-compilation in Guix. For cross-compilation to > work, the build-system needs to

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-11 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Montag, dem 11.09.2023 um 18:19 +0200 schrieb Simon Tournier: > Hi Mathieu, > > On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 at 11:14, Mathieu Othacehe > wrote: > > > Here is a status of cross-compilation in Guix. For cross- > > compilation to > > work, the build-system needs to support cross-compilation. > > > >

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-11 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Mathieu, On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 at 11:14, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Here is a status of cross-compilation in Guix. For cross-compilation to > work, the build-system needs to support cross-compilation. > > The following build-systems explicitly refuse cross-compiling packages: > > haskell, agda,

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-10 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Hi Mathieu, Am Sonntag, dem 10.09.2023 um 11:14 +0200 schrieb Mathieu Othacehe: > I have CC'ed members of the python, java, ruby, rust, r, haskell and > emacs teams. Any plans adding cross-compilation support to your > build-system, barriers to overcome? For Emacs, there are layers of problems.

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-10 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Mathieu! Mathieu Othacehe writes: > Hello, > > In order for Guix to become an alternative to tools such as Yocto and > Buildroot, having most or all our packages cross-compiling is a > prerequisite. > > Here is a status of cross-compilation in Guix. For cross-compilation to > work, the

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-10 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 11:14:29AM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > Hello, > > In order for Guix to become an alternative to tools such as Yocto and > Buildroot, having most or all our packages cross-compiling is a > prerequisite. > > Here is a status of cross-compilation in Guix. For

Re: Cross compilation status

2023-09-10 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Sep 10, 2023 at 11:14:29AM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > > I have CC'ed members of the python, java, ruby, rust, r, haskell and > emacs teams. Any plans adding cross-compilation support to your > build-system, barriers to overcome? Speaking as the one who added the rakudo build system

Cross compilation status

2023-09-10 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello, In order for Guix to become an alternative to tools such as Yocto and Buildroot, having most or all our packages cross-compiling is a prerequisite. Here is a status of cross-compilation in Guix. For cross-compilation to work, the build-system needs to support cross-compilation. The