Duh! I'm so sorry about this. I had check some days (weeks?) ago, saw
it wasn't there, prepared the package then rebased. In the meantime
Sharlatan had committed it too!
Maybe we could have a `make` or `guix lint` warning for this kind of
things, I suppose they are bound to happen in the *-xyz
Hi Pierre,
One of your recent commits (22796f1ad16abb7b1519d11332175d147ae10b82)
adds pathname-utils to "lisp-xyz.scm", however there was already
a definition for this package (starting at line 16030).
As far as I can see it doesn't break anything because the previous
definition is just shadowed b
