On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 03:23:51 +0200 Marius wrote:
> Can you point out which part of the upstream bug that is relevant?
>
> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291
the fact that it is still open after 10 years is relevance enough -
IMHO i would want to see that bug closed as
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:11:50 +0200 Andy wrote:
> Are you aware of any concrete issue that has been raised
look no further than the original 10 year old bug report that was never
closed - that is enough "concrete" for my sensibilities - it plainly
demonstrates that even the chromium developers are
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 25 Sep 2018 21:36, Clément Lassieur writes:
>
>> Thank you very much for letting us know about these issues! I'm glad
>> Marius put it in a channel then, it was a wise decision. I hope we'll
>> make it free at some point, so that it can be integrated into Guix.
On Tue 25 Sep 2018 21:36, Clément Lassieur writes:
> Thank you very much for letting us know about these issues! I'm glad
> Marius put it in a channel then, it was a wise decision. I hope we'll
> make it free at some point, so that it can be integrated into Guix. But
> there is Icecat 60 now
bill-auger writes:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:08:42 +0200 Marius wrote:
>> Can you elaborate on what exactly the issue is? I am aware that
>> Chromium bundles non-free sources
>> That leaves "first party" source files. Admittedly I haven't audited
>> all of those other than superficial grepping.
On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:08:42 +0200 Marius wrote:
> Can you elaborate on what exactly the issue is? I am aware that
> Chromium bundles non-free sources
> That leaves "first party" source files. Admittedly I haven't audited
> all of those other than superficial grepping. Do you know whether
>
Brett Gilio writes:
> On 09/25/2018 03:22 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>>
>> So at least it is apparently possible to get a working binary with only
>> free sources.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>
> Hi Andreas,
>
> Can you verify that the debian package is only working with free
> sources, and not simply
On 09/25/2018 03:22 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
So at least it is apparently possible to get a working binary with only
free sources.
Andreas
Hi Andreas,
Can you verify that the debian package is only working with free
sources, and not simply reiterating the misconception that the chromium
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> That leaves "first party" source files. Admittedly I haven't audited
>> all of those other than superficial grepping. Do you know whether parts
>> of Chromium are considered non-free? I noticed
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 09:08:42PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> That leaves "first party" source files. Admittedly I haven't audited
> all of those other than superficial grepping. Do you know whether parts
> of Chromium are considered non-free? I noticed a number of files are
> missing
Hello Bill,
bill-auger writes:
> regarding the recent proposal of introducing chromium into guix; i have
> done a lot of research and participated in much discussion regarding
> it's fitness regarding the FSDG; and i am quite surprised to see it so
> much as suggest into guix
>
> for the
Hi Bill,
Thank you very much for letting us know about these issues! I'm glad
Marius put it in a channel then, it was a wise decision. I hope we'll
make it free at some point, so that it can be integrated into Guix. But
there is Icecat 60 now (thanks to everyone involved!), so it's not that
Forwarded Message
Subject:FSDG status of chromium
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 09:29:22 -0400
From: bill-auger
Organization: peers.community
To: guix-devel@gnu.org
regarding the recent proposal of introducing chromium into guix; i have
done a lot of research
regarding the recent proposal of introducing chromium into guix; i have
done a lot of research and participated in much discussion regarding
it's fitness regarding the FSDG; and i am quite surprised to see it so
much as suggest into guix
for the benefit of anyone who does not not know, the
14 matches
Mail list logo
