Hi Noé,
Noé Lopez via "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
skribis:
> I was looking at the previous GSoC projects page and the GNUNet project
> seems really cool to me. I had already dreamed about having
> decentralized substitutes, so I would love to have this.
I would en
Hi guix,
I was looking at the previous GSoC projects page and the GNUNet project
seems really cool to me. I had already dreamed about having
decentralized substitutes, so I would love to have this.
The previous discussions date from pretty long ago (2015 at the time of
the GSoC project), can some
Andreas Enge writes:
> the attached patch attempts to update gnunet to its current release 0.10.1.
> It fails one of its tests; Sree, could you maybe look into it? It would be
> nice to be up-to-date before coming to the GHM in gnunet's birth place!
gnunet-0.10.0 also started failing on both i68
On 08/12/2014 08:25 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> the attached patch attempts to update gnunet to its current release 0.10.1.
>> > It fails one of its tests; Sree, could you maybe look into it? It would be
>> > nice to be up-to-date before coming to the GHM in gnunet's birth place!
> Indeed. :-)
Andreas Enge skribis:
> the attached patch attempts to update gnunet to its current release 0.10.1.
> It fails one of its tests; Sree, could you maybe look into it? It would be
> nice to be up-to-date before coming to the GHM in gnunet's birth place!
Indeed. :-) Likewise, I hope we can take th
Hello,
the attached patch attempts to update gnunet to its current release 0.10.1.
It fails one of its tests; Sree, could you maybe look into it? It would be
nice to be up-to-date before coming to the GHM in gnunet's birth place!
Thanks,
Andreas
diff --git a/gnu-system.am b/gnu-system.am
index
