Hi,
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Yesterday I published a post on this topic:
>>
>> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/guile-3-and-guix/
>
> Very nice! It’s impressive how you managed to give structure to
> something that initially seems like “just a few changes here and
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Yesterday I published a post on this topic:
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/guile-3-and-guix/
Very nice! It’s impressive how you managed to give structure to
something that initially seems like “just a few changes here and
there”. Thanks for writing this!
Two
Hello!
Yesterday I published a post on this topic:
https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2020/guile-3-and-guix/
Enjoy! :-)
Ludo’.
Hi!
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Regardless, I would go ahead and move (guix self) to Guile 3 now.
>
> Sounds good to me!
Done in 039cb8e6b11928639915eba40a9ead1bed1fef5f.
There’s a build failure on aarch64 that I’m tracking down:
http://ci.guix.info/build/2184296
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Regardless, I would go ahead and move (guix self) to Guile 3 now.
Sounds good to me!
--
Ricardo
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>
>> However, on ARMv7, Guile 3.0 segfaults as it’s building:
>>
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/8b8c0hxvm9qa5kff168vdr3943cc2s61-guile-next-3.0.0
>
> It seems that the regression happened between 2.9.4 and 2.9.9¹:
>
> https://ci.guix.gn
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> However, on ARMv7, Guile 3.0 segfaults as it’s building:
>
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/8b8c0hxvm9qa5kff168vdr3943cc2s61-guile-next-3.0.0
It seems that the regression happened between 2.9.4 and 2.9.9¹:
https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1687242/details
I’v
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
>> Once we’re done, we can change (guix self) so that ‘guix pull’
>> pulls Guix on Guile 3.
>
> The attached patch does that, I tested it with “make as-derivation”.
> I’ll do some more testing but unless I’m overlooking something, we can
> apply it anytime
Hello Guix!
Ludovic Courtès skribis:
> 2. We must be able to run Guix itself on Guile 3. This is already
> possible if you add “3.0” to the ‘GUILE_PKG’ invocation in
> ‘configure.ac’, but there are still a few test failures that I’ve
> been working on. Almost all of them relat
Hi!
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> On 2020-01-16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Today is Guile 3 day, a day to celebrate, woohoo! \o/
>
> Yay!
>
>> How will Guix migrate to Guile 3? That’s a threefold process:
> ...
>> 2. We must be able to run Guix itself on Guile 3. This is already
>> poss
On 2020-01-16, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Today is Guile 3 day, a day to celebrate, woohoo! \o/
Yay!
> How will Guix migrate to Guile 3? That’s a threefold process:
...
> 2. We must be able to run Guix itself on Guile 3. This is already
> possible if you add “3.0” to the ‘GUILE_PKG’ invoc
Hello!
Efraim Flashner skribis:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello Guix!
>>
>> Today is Guile 3 day, a day to celebrate, woohoo! \o/
>>
>> How will Guix migrate to Guile 3? That’s a threefold process:
>>
>> 1. We must first migrate packages. I pro
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:08:15AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> Today is Guile 3 day, a day to celebrate, woohoo! \o/
>
> How will Guix migrate to Guile 3? That’s a threefold process:
>
> 1. We must first migrate packages. I propose to rename “guile-next”
> to “guile
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 11:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> 1. We must first migrate packages. I propose to rename “guile-next”
> to “guile” today, such that “guix install guile” will now install
> Guile 3 (no mass rebuild involved: the “default” Guile remains
> 2.2.)
>
> T
Hello Guix!
Today is Guile 3 day, a day to celebrate, woohoo! \o/
How will Guix migrate to Guile 3? That’s a threefold process:
1. We must first migrate packages. I propose to rename “guile-next”
to “guile” today, such that “guix install guile” will now install
Guile 3 (no mass re
15 matches
Mail list logo
