Guix-based build tool

Hello! Pjotr Prins skribis: > Indeed, I love working with Guix and developing with Guix. Guix takes > care of my deployment and configuration requirements. > > I have written some time in the past that with Guix you don't need > autotools. The main thing autotools solve is configuring the build

Re: Guix-based build tool

Le 2018-04-09 17:30, l...@gnu.org a écrit : Hello! Pjotr Prins skribis: Indeed, I love working with Guix and developing with Guix. Guix takes care of my deployment and configuration requirements. I have written some time in the past that with Guix you don't need autotools. The main thing aut

Re: Guix-based build tool

2018-04-09 17:30 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Hello! > > Pjotr Prins skribis: > > > Indeed, I love working with Guix and developing with Guix. Guix takes > > care of my deployment and configuration requirements. > > > > I have written some time in the past that with Guix you don't need > > autot

Re: Guix-based build tool

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hello! > > Pjotr Prins skribis: > >> Indeed, I love working with Guix and developing with Guix. Guix takes >> care of my deployment and configuration requirements. >> >> I have written some time in the past that with Guix you don't need >> autotools. The main thing autot

Re: Guix-based build tool

Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > David Thompson has made many comments before on the mistake of mixing > build systems and package managers... I'm a bit worried that we might be > encouraging going down that same path? The Guix daemon implements the functional software deployment model. That

Re: Guix-based build tool

Hi Chris & Chris, :-) Chris Marusich skribis: > Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > >> David Thompson has made many comments before on the mistake of mixing >> build systems and package managers... I'm a bit worried that we might be >> encouraging going down that same path? > > The Guix daemon

Re: Guix-based build tool

Hello, Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > While this is a fun idea, I'd still much rather have a guile-based > DSL replacement for autotools type things that's standalone (but maybe > also which can export to shell if need be). Yeah, not depending on Guix would have pros (it’d be more widely

Re: Guix-based build tool

2018-04-18 23:09 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès : > Hello, > > Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: > > > While this is a fun idea, I'd still much rather have a guile-based > > DSL replacement for autotools type things that's standalone (but maybe > > also which can export to shell if need be). > > Yeah

Re: Guix-based build tool

2018-04-19 18:49 GMT+02:00 Catonano : > > > 2018-04-18 23:09 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès : > >> Hello, >> >> Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: >> >> > While this is a fun idea, I'd still much rather have a guile-based >> > DSL replacement for autotools type things that's standalone (but maybe >> >

Re: Guix-based build tool

2018-04-20 8:52 GMT+02:00 Catonano : > 2018-04-19 18:49 GMT+02:00 Catonano : > >> >> >> 2018-04-18 23:09 GMT+02:00 Ludovic Courtès : >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Christopher Lemmer Webber skribis: >>> >>> > While this is a fun idea, I'd still much rather have a guile-based >>> > DSL replacement for auto

Re: Guix-based build tool

Hi Catonano, That’s a lot of text :-) and it seems we’ve drifted away from the initial discussion. Perhaps this should go to guile-u...@gnu.org, or did I mischaracterize what you were asking? Thanks, Ludo’.

Re: Guix-based build tool

Hi Catonano, > I am experimenting with this line > > (system* "guile" "-c" "(use-modules (commonmark)) (exit ((lambda () 0)))") > > If it finds the module it returns 0 > > Otherwise it returns a different number > > I copied some bits for a configure script for a Guile project instrumented > with