Hi Bruno,
Am Dienstag, dem 26.09.2023 um 19:35 +0100 schrieb Bruno Victal:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been thinking on a plan to address this old NFS question.
>
> The plan:
>
> 1. Allow the file-system `dependencies' field to accept arbitrary
> shepherd symbols as well.
Sure, why not?
> This can be
Hi all,
I've been thinking on a plan to address this old NFS question.
The plan:
1. Allow the file-system `dependencies' field to accept arbitrary
shepherd symbols as well.
This can be done by having the `dependency->shepherd-service-name'
in (gnu services base) also accept matching against a
Am Mittwoch, dem 08.03.2023 um 14:54 + schrieb Bruno Victal:
> Co-authored-by: Felix Lechner
>
> Some observations and potential plans of action to improve file-
> system handling and proper NFS support within Guix.
>
>
> Relaxing dependency field of file-system record type
> ===
Hi,
Bruno Victal writes:
> Co-authored-by: Felix Lechner
>
>
> Some observations and potential plans of action to improve file-system
> handling
> and proper NFS support within Guix.
>
>
> Relaxing dependency field of file-system record type
> ===
Co-authored-by: Felix Lechner
Some observations and potential plans of action to improve file-system handling
and proper NFS support within Guix.
Relaxing dependency field of file-system record type
===
Guix currently