Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-28 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nikita Karetnikov skribis: >> This line is: > >> ASSERT (st1.st_ctime < st2.st_ctime >> || (st1.st_ctime == st2.st_ctime >> && get_stat_ctime_ns (&st1) < get_stat_ctime_ns (&st2))); > >> (See >>

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-27 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
> This line is: > ASSERT (st1.st_ctime < st2.st_ctime > || (st1.st_ctime == st2.st_ctime > && get_stat_ctime_ns (&st1) < get_stat_ctime_ns (&st2))); > (See > .) > Could it have someth

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-26 Thread Mark H Weaver
Mark H Weaver writes: > Andreas Enge writes: > >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:50AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >>> A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've >>> pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch. >> >> Excellent! Did you report it upstream? > > Yes: http://

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-26 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Nikita Karetnikov skribis: > (Not sure why my previous messages weren’t signed.) > >>> Now, should I test the mentioned fix? > >> Yes, please do! > > The coreutils package fails to build: > > FAIL: test-fchownat (exit: 134) > === > > test-chown.h:193: assertion failed

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-23 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:50AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: >> A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've >> pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch. > > Excellent! Did you report it upstream? Yes: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.ff

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-23 Thread Mark H Weaver
Nikita Karetnikov writes: > The coreutils package fails to build: > > FAIL: test-fchownat (exit: 134) > === > > test-chown.h:193: assertion failed Hmm. The same derivation (with the same hash) passes this test and builds successfully on my YeeLoong. Perhaps the prob

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-23 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
(Not sure why my previous messages weren’t signed.) >> Now, should I test the mentioned fix? > Yes, please do! The coreutils package fails to build: FAIL: test-fchownat (exit: 134) === test-chown.h:193: assertion failed […] == 1

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-23 Thread Andreas Enge
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 01:11:50AM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've > pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch. Excellent! Did you report it upstream? Andreas

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Nikita Karetnikov writes: >> A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've >> pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch. It will require rebuilding >> quite a few packages, so I recommend aborting whatever builds you have >> running, and pulling the latest 'loongson' bef

Re: Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-22 Thread Nikita Karetnikov
> A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've > pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch. It will require rebuilding > quite a few packages, so I recommend aborting whatever builds you have > running, and pulling the latest 'loongson' before continuing. I successfully

Important libffi bug fix for MIPS N32

2013-10-22 Thread Mark H Weaver
Hello MIPS Guix! A failing test in glib alerted me to a bug in libffi on MIPS N32. I've pushed a fix[*] to the 'loongson' branch. It will require rebuilding quite a few packages, so I recommend aborting whatever builds you have running, and pulling the latest 'loongson' before continuing.