Hi,
On Monday, March 7, 2022 5:41:46 AM EST Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Philip McGrath skribis:
> > To start with that, my proposed approach, which I hope satisfies the
> > FSDG, is here: https://github.com/racket/srfi/pull/15
>
> Good to know; I hope the next Racket release will include
Hi,
Philip McGrath skribis:
> To start with that, my proposed approach, which I hope satisfies the
> FSDG, is here: https://github.com/racket/srfi/pull/15
Good to know; I hope the next Racket release will include it.
Thank you,
Ludo’.
Hi,
On 10/29/21 10:44, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hi,
This reply has taken a while because I did as you suggested and wrote
some free replacement documentation (which involved paging back in some
confusing details[1] and shaving several yaks), so now we have something
concrete to talk about.
Hi,
Philip McGrath skribis:
> Since 2005, SRFIs have used the MIT/Expat license, and all but two
> older SRFIs were relicensed: however, the SRFI editors were not able
> to contact the author of SRFI 5, Andy Gaynor, so it remains under the
> original SRFI license.[1] That license, modeled on
Hi Guix,
I was recently reminded of a thorny license issue with the SRFI 5
standard document, which is part of the main Racket distribution. People
from Racket, the SRFI community, Debian, and Fedora have taken steps to
help mitigate the problem: I want to make some further improvements
