Re: Lisp team: Should we package Quicklisp?

2023-04-02 Thread Guillaume Le Vaillant
"jgart" skribis: > Hi, what do you think if we package Quicklisp? > > For example, we have emacs-straight packaged which is a purely functional > package manager for the Emacs hacker that is not Guix. > > I think it could be convenient to have. > > https://www.quicklisp.org/ Hi. Do you mean mak

Lisp team: Should we package Quicklisp?

2023-04-01 Thread jgart
Hi, what do you think if we package Quicklisp? For example, we have emacs-straight packaged which is a purely functional package manager for the Emacs hacker that is not Guix. I think it could be convenient to have. https://www.quicklisp.org/