"jgart" skribis:
> Hi, what do you think if we package Quicklisp?
>
> For example, we have emacs-straight packaged which is a purely functional
> package manager for the Emacs hacker that is not Guix.
>
> I think it could be convenient to have.
>
> https://www.quicklisp.org/
Hi.
Do you mean mak
Hi, what do you think if we package Quicklisp?
For example, we have emacs-straight packaged which is a purely functional
package manager for the Emacs hacker that is not Guix.
I think it could be convenient to have.
https://www.quicklisp.org/