Cuirass package build timeouts and max-silent-time [was Re: Merging branch wip-haskell]

2023-03-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 08:31:33PM +0100, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > Hello Felix, > > > I see build failures [1] for Ghc 9.2.5 in the Cuirass job set [2] for > > my own feature branch. [3] They are caused by a one-hour timeout. Did > > you folks figure out how to extend the timeout limit on Cuira

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-03-08 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Lars, On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:31 AM Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > > I don’t see GHC being rebuild How about here [1] please? Maybe I'm misreading the log: building path(s) `/gnu/store/xdl4lyjjai90w21whf7xwvdqh8cf7hy7-cpphs-1.20.9.1-1.cabal' building path(s) `/gnu/store/199mrp0p6l9pld

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-03-08 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hello Felix, > I see build failures [1] for Ghc 9.2.5 in the Cuirass job set [2] for > my own feature branch. [3] They are caused by a one-hour timeout. Did > you folks figure out how to extend the timeout limit on Cuirass when > working on your own branch? Thanks! I don’t see GHC being rebuild i

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-03-08 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 3:05 AM Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > > the branch has been merged into master. I see build failures [1] for Ghc 9.2.5 in the Cuirass job set [2] for my own feature branch. [3] They are caused by a one-hour timeout. Did you folks figure out how to extend the timeout lim

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-03-07 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 12:54:03PM +0200 schrieb Efraim Flashner: > > By the way, when building pandoc for my core-updates profile, I noticed > > that ghc bootstrapping takes a terribly long time. Might there be a fleeting > > chance to jump over some older releases? > I believe in core-updates I'v

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-27 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
Hi Lars, > the branch has been merged into master. Thank you for that giant contribution to making Haskell more usable in Guix! Kind regards Felix Lechner

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-27 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi, > > the branch has been merged into master. > \o/ Nice, thank you! well, GHC fails a single testcase on i686 (which we did not test for wip-haskell) right now[1], but it’ll take some rounds of building it locally until I have this sorted out too. Lars [1] https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/230900?

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-27 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 at 10:47, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > the branch has been merged into master. \o/ Nice, thank you! Cheers, simo

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-26 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi, > just a heads-up: The long overdue Haskell update is finally rolling in, > bumping our packages to Stackage release 20.5 and the compiler to 9.2. The > corresponding issue is #61420. the branch has been merged into master. Lars

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-22 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:37:41AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello Lars, > > Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:38:23AM +0100 schrieb zimoun: > > Feel free to merge. :-) > > +1, please go ahead! > > By the way, when building pandoc for my core-updates profile, I noticed > that ghc bootstrapping takes

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-22 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello Lars, Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:38:23AM +0100 schrieb zimoun: > Feel free to merge. :-) +1, please go ahead! By the way, when building pandoc for my core-updates profile, I noticed that ghc bootstrapping takes a terribly long time. Might there be a fleeting chance to jump over some older

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-15 Thread zimoun
Hi Lars, On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 10:01, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > Is there anything preventing a merge into currently? Can we coordinate > the merge with some other big world-rebuilding changes waiting to happen > (apart from core-updates)? As discussed in #61420 [1], from my small experiments

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-15 Thread Andreas Enge
Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:45:47AM +0100 schrieb Lars-Dominik Braun: > There’s a job on CI already: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/wip-haskell Okay, then it should be fine to merge; since both build farms are enabled by default, if there are substitutes at one of them, this is enough. Thanks! An

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-15 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi Andreas, > I do not think we should coordinate, this was part of the motivation for > considering feature branches in the first place, to avoid entanglement > with different updates. ah, alright. I’ll give everyone more time for reviews and then just merge it. > However, QA has not run yet: >

Re: Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-15 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello Lars, Am Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 10:01:16AM +0100 schrieb Lars-Dominik Braun: > just a heads-up: The long overdue Haskell update is finally rolling in, > bumping our packages to Stackage release 20.5 and the compiler to 9.2. The > corresponding issue is #61420. congratulations! > Is there any

Merging branch wip-haskell

2023-02-15 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi, just a heads-up: The long overdue Haskell update is finally rolling in, bumping our packages to Stackage release 20.5 and the compiler to 9.2. The corresponding issue is #61420. Is there anything preventing a merge into currently? Can we coordinate the merge with some other big world-rebuildi