On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 03:33:23PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
> Okay, understood. However, there's now the choice between a
> specific category (disassembler.scm) and a meta category
> (reverse-engineering.scm).
> Not having read every single line of the source of Guix yet, are
> meta-categories i
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hi Nils,
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 03:38:42PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>>
>> As this doesn't do the job for me, I propose
>> gnu/packages/disassembler.scm
>> or
>> gnu/packages/re.scm
>> or
>> gnu/packages/reverse-engineering.scm
>> as it specifies an existing categor
Hi Nils,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 03:38:42PM +0100, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>
> As this doesn't do the job for me, I propose
> gnu/packages/disassembler.scm
> or
> gnu/packages/re.scm
> or
> gnu/packages/reverse-engineering.scm
> as it specifies an existing category of software and is not just
> anot
I see nothing in gnu/packages/ where I could put reverse
engineering, disassembler tools.
What I want to package is the disassember panopticon
(https://panopticon.re)
Existing:
code.scm is a bit too generic for the specific purpose of panopticon
debug.scm does not get the category right.
As this
