Hi,
Maxime Devos skribis:
> It might be possible to modify 'make-forkexec-constructor/container' to call
> (exec-command (cons* newuidmap ARGUMENTS-TO-NEWUIDMAP command) ...),
> where newuidmap is (search-input-file "newuidmap" '("/run/setuid-programs"
> "/usr/sbin" "/sbin")).
> That path shoul
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 04-10-2021 om 16:32 [+0200]:
> Maxime Devos skribis:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 02-10-2021 om 16:27 [+0200]:
> > > Maxime Devos skribis:
> > >
> > > > Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 28-09-2021 om 14:21 [+0200]:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Joshua Bran
Maxime Devos skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 02-10-2021 om 16:27 [+0200]:
>> Maxime Devos skribis:
>>
>> > Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 28-09-2021 om 14:21 [+0200]:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Joshua Branson skribis:
>> > >
>> > > > Apologies if I'm speaking for something I know very
Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 02-10-2021 om 16:27 [+0200]:
> Maxime Devos skribis:
>
> > Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 28-09-2021 om 14:21 [+0200]:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Joshua Branson skribis:
> > >
> > > > Apologies if I'm speaking for something I know very little
> > > > about...Wouldn't it
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[…]
> I’m in favor of (gnu home services) rather than (gnu services), in part
> because we have yet to figure out how much can be shared between System
> and Home services, and in part because the Home bits are likely useless
> for System.
Moved to (gnu home services) in
Maxime Devos skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 28-09-2021 om 14:21 [+0200]:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Joshua Branson skribis:
>>
>> > Apologies if I'm speaking for something I know very little
>> > about...Wouldn't it be nice if guix home services would accept a user
>> > and a group field? For the
Hi,
Xinglu Chen skribis:
> I think it would be better to put home services in the same modules as
> system services, i.e., (gnu services mcron) would contain the Mcron
> service for Guix System and the Mcron service for Guix Home. That would
> also mean that we wouldn’t have to export ‘job-file
Hi!
Oleg Pykhalov skribis:
> Andrew Tropin writes:
>
> […]
>
>>> I would very much like to have these modules renamed to (gnu home
>>> services …) quickly. WDYT? Could the two of you take a look?
>>
>> Doable.
>>
>> What about moving home services to (gnu services ...)?
>>
>> It's a little ha
Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 28-09-2021 om 14:21 [+0200]:
> Hi,
>
> Joshua Branson skribis:
>
> > Apologies if I'm speaking for something I know very little
> > about...Wouldn't it be nice if guix home services would accept a user
> > and a group field? For the syncthing service, perhaps the u
Andrew Tropin writes:
[…]
>> I would very much like to have these modules renamed to (gnu home
>> services …) quickly. WDYT? Could the two of you take a look?
>
> Doable.
>
> What about moving home services to (gnu services ...)?
>
> It's a little harder, because we probably will need to adjus
On Tue, Sep 28 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (+ Cc: Oleg.)
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>> For now my personal ranking of the ideas is following:
>>
>> 1. Move to (gnu services ...) :: can(?) provide some additional reusability.
>> 2. Keep as it is right now (gnu home-services ...) :: al
On 2021-09-28 14:26, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (+ Cc: Oleg.)
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>> For now my personal ranking of the ideas is following:
>>
>> 1. Move to (gnu services ...) :: can(?) provide some additional reusability.
>> 2. Keep as it is right now (gnu home-services ...) :: al
Hi,
(+ Cc: Oleg.)
Andrew Tropin skribis:
> For now my personal ranking of the ideas is following:
>
> 1. Move to (gnu services ...) :: can(?) provide some additional reusability.
> 2. Keep as it is right now (gnu home-services ...) :: already works.
> 3. Move to (gnu home services ...) :: good
Hi,
Joshua Branson skribis:
> Apologies if I'm speaking for something I know very little
> about...Wouldn't it be nice if guix home services would accept a user
> and a group field? For the syncthing service, perhaps the user wants to
> limit Syncthing's runtime permissions. So instead of runn
Hi,
Xinglu Chen skribis:
> I didn’t know about the parent mechanism; that could be an approach to
> take. But since ‘define-configuration’ is based on (guix records),
> would it make sense to adapt (guix records) to (rnrs records syntactic)
> instead of SRFI-9 records?
Yes, it would make sense
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Tropin skribis:
> On 2021-09-23 22:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> Silly question, but why do we need to have two different configuration
>> record types in the first place?
To be clear: you’ll have to be very convincing as I know all too well
the cost of maintaining suc
On 2021-09-23 22:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Andrew Tropin skribis:
>
>> However, ~(gnu home services ...)~ also looks cool, but it would be a
>> little inconsistent with system services, which will have one level of
>> nestiness less: ~(gnu services)~.
>>
>> IMO, ~(gnu home services ...
On 2021-09-24 16:03, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Xinglu Chen schreef op vr 24-09-2021 om 15:35 [+0200]:
>> On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Xinglu Chen skribis:
>> >
>> > > Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
>> > > for instance,
Hi,
Xinglu Chen writes:
> On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Xinglu Chen skribis:
>>
>>> Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
>>> for instance, Guix System currently has a service for configuring
>>> Syncthing, and I think it makes sen
Xinglu Chen schreef op vr 24-09-2021 om 17:39 [+0200]:
>
[...]
> I didn’t know about the parent mechanism; that could be an approach to
> take. But since ‘define-configuration’ is based on (guix records),
> would it make sense to adapt (guix records) to (rnrs records syntactic)
> instead of SRFI-
On Fri, Sep 24 2021, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Xinglu Chen schreef op vr 24-09-2021 om 15:35 [+0200]:
>> On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Xinglu Chen skribis:
>> >
>> > > Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
>> > > for instance,
Xinglu Chen writes:
> On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Xinglu Chen skribis:
>>
>>> Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
>>> for instance, Guix System currently has a service for configuring
>>> Syncthing, and I think it makes sense to
Xinglu Chen schreef op vr 24-09-2021 om 15:35 [+0200]:
> On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Xinglu Chen skribis:
> >
> > > Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
> > > for instance, Guix System currently has a service for configuring
On Thu, Sep 23 2021, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Xinglu Chen skribis:
>
>> Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
>> for instance, Guix System currently has a service for configuring
>> Syncthing, and I think it makes sense to also have one for Guix Home,
>>
On 2021-09-23 22:08, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Xinglu Chen skribis:
>
>> Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
>> for instance, Guix System currently has a service for configuring
>> Syncthing, and I think it makes sense to also have one for Guix Home,
>>
Hi,
Andrew Tropin skribis:
> However, ~(gnu home services ...)~ also looks cool, but it would be a
> little inconsistent with system services, which will have one level of
> nestiness less: ~(gnu services)~.
>
> IMO, ~(gnu home services ...)~ would be a good choice if we use ~(gnu
> system servi
Hi,
Xinglu Chen skribis:
> Some services might be useful to have in both Guix System and Guix Home;
> for instance, Guix System currently has a service for configuring
> Syncthing, and I think it makes sense to also have one for Guix Home,
> this would mean that people not using Guix System (me
On Fri, Sep 17 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
> On 2021-09-17 11:28, Xinglu Chen wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 16 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>>
> * Putting Home Services to ~(gnu services ...)~
> In the thread https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49419#18 Ludovic suggested:
>
>> Regarding module name
On 2021-09-17 11:28, Xinglu Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
* Putting Home Services to ~(gnu services ...)~
In the thread https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49419#18 Ludovic suggested:
> Regarding module names: what about putting everything in the (gnu
> h
On Thu, Sep 16 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>>> * Putting Home Services to ~(gnu services ...)~
>>> In the thread https://issues.guix.gnu.org/49419#18 Ludovic suggested:
>>>
Regarding module names: what about putting everything in the (gnu
home …) name space. For services, I wonder if we
On 2021-09-15 09:50, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote:
> Xinglu Chen writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 15 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
>>> Records even for the same services have slightly different fields and
>>> because of macro nature can't be reused between Home and System
>>> services. In more details I ment
On 2021-09-15 15:06, Xinglu Chen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>
>> This topic was raised a few times during development of Guix Home
>> project and also during the review of wip-guix-home branch. I made a
>> separate thread to do an exhaustive discussion of it.
>>
>> * Servi
On 2021-09-16 03:05, Ryan Prior wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 15th, 2021 at 8:47 AM, Andrew Tropin
>> People will be trying to use home services inside operating systems, and
>> configuration record for system services inside home services.
>
> I think it will be a dismal design failure if we
On Wednesday, September 15th, 2021 at 8:47 AM, Andrew Tropin
> People will be trying to use home services inside operating systems, and
> configuration record for system services inside home services.
I think it will be a dismal design failure if we cannot make this just work the
way people woul
Xinglu Chen writes:
> On Wed, Sep 15 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
>> Records even for the same services have slightly different fields and
>> because of macro nature can't be reused between Home and System
>> services. In more details I mentioned this problem here:
>> https://lists.sr.ht/~abcdw/rd
On 2021-09-15 12:09, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Andrew Tropin schreef op wo 15-09-2021 om 11:47 [+0300]:
>> *** Confusion
>> I already mentioned that I see a lot of confusion between System and
>> Shepherd services and I expect some confusion between home and system
>> services, it will be especially t
On Wed, Sep 15 2021, Andrew Tropin wrote:
> This topic was raised a few times during development of Guix Home
> project and also during the review of wip-guix-home branch. I made a
> separate thread to do an exhaustive discussion of it.
>
> * Services and Confusion
> It's an optional section, you
Andrew Tropin schreef op wo 15-09-2021 om 11:47 [+0300]:
> *** Confusion
> I already mentioned that I see a lot of confusion between System and
> Shepherd services and I expect some confusion between home and system
> services, it will be especially true if we place them in the same
> namespace.
>
This topic was raised a few times during development of Guix Home
project and also during the review of wip-guix-home branch. I made a
separate thread to do an exhaustive discussion of it.
* Services and Confusion
It's an optional section, you can skip it, but I still find it somehow
related to t
39 matches
Mail list logo
