Dear,
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 at 15:54, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I think this will make searching easier because not everything has an
> > obvious name, and when I `guix search` for a purpose (like drawing) I
> > often get unrelated results.
>
> I don’t think the module hierarchy should be
Jesse Gibbons writes:
> Interesting. So is it worth trying to organize the guix packages or do
> you think it will get too complicated? I'm primarily bothered by the
> number of small files with only one package definition and the
> inconsistency in how packages are organized. I would rather a
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:38:34 +0200
Robert Vollmert wrote:
> > On 15. Jul 2019, at 19:21, Jesse Gibbons
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 15:54:10 +0200
> > Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> Jesse Gibbons skribis:
> >>
> >>> I noticed that a few files have only one
> On 15. Jul 2019, at 19:21, Jesse Gibbons wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 15:54:10 +0200
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> Jesse Gibbons skribis:
>>
>>> I noticed that a few files have only one package definition and are
>>> named for that package. I think these packages can be
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 15:54:10 +0200
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Jesse Gibbons skribis:
>
> > I noticed that a few files have only one package definition and are
> > named for that package. I think these packages can be organized
> > better. Might I suggest the following rules:
> >
> >
Hello!
Jesse Gibbons skribis:
> I noticed that a few files have only one package definition and are
> named for that package. I think these packages can be organized better.
> Might I suggest the following rules:
>
> 1. if a package is a library for a particular language $LANG (like
> Python,
I noticed that a few files have only one package definition and are
named for that package. I think these packages can be organized better.
Might I suggest the following rules:
1. if a package is a library for a particular language $LANG (like
Python, Perl, etc.) it goes in ${LANG}-xyz.scm. If it
