zimoun schreef op vr 17-06-2022 om 16:36 [+0200]:
> Well, I do not know if the parallel computation of PARI/GP are
> reproducible. But the building of PARI/GP is not; because some
> documentation…
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> $ diff -r --no-dereference
Am Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:44:45PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Am Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:36:54PM +0200 schrieb zimoun:
> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 14:35, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > > configure flag "--mp=pthread". It will transparently parallelise a number
> > --mt=pthread
> Indee
Am Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:36:54PM +0200 schrieb zimoun:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 14:35, Andreas Enge wrote:
> > configure flag "--mp=pthread". It will transparently parallelise a number
> --mt=pthread
Indeed, thanks!
> No objection. Maybe it is the occasion to also transform
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 at 14:35, Andreas Enge wrote:
> configure flag "--mp=pthread". It will transparently parallelise a number
^
--mt=pthread
> What do you think? Are there any objections?
No objection. Maybe it is the occasion to also transf
Hello,
PARI/GP ("guix edit pari-gp") provides several mechanisms of parallelism,
which could be honoured by providing different package variants.
After discussion with the author, I would suggest to enable the pthread
interface in the standard package (and to not provide an MPI variant unless
so
