On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 01:30:06PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> We may as well delete the packaged
> items (as I have been doing for two or three I just packaged now), and
> leave only TODO items.
Well, no; I have actually kept packages that I did not yet add to my
preliminary sage recipe, be
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:47:29AM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> I followed the link, but, IIUC, it is not up-to-date. For example, we
> already have packaged many of them. Would it be useful to set-up
> a world-writable document (e.g., a pad) somewhere, with a list of the
> packages yet to be
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> My personal goal is to get closer to having Sage in Guix.
Very nice!
> But there is also a list of (altogether 181!) required dependencies,
> which I extracted here: https://hackmd.io/zatG6NwtTWKF5asn_fmcIw?view
I followed the link, but, IIUC, it is not
Hello,
until Thursday evening, before joining the Guile-Guix-Perl days in
Strasbourg, I am taking part in a coding sprint around packaging Sagemath:
https://hackmd.io/j5FzB173Q4uaExUw-6Glpg#
My personal goal is to get closer to having Sage in Guix. As usual, I have
started a package definition
