Perl modules dual licensing (was Re: Bioconductor package flowPeaks license Artistic 1.0?)

2019-12-20 Thread Giovanni Biscuolo
least since 1994-10-17 (see the README history [1] > What I understand is: when the License of Perl 5 There is no "License of Perl 5", it is Perl 5 that is dual licensed The same dual license scheme is usually (usually?!?) adopted by Perl modules, at least those on CPAN http://www

Re: [PATCH] Perl modules for HTML and XML

2015-12-24 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Cyril Roelandt writes: > On 12/23/2015 11:53 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> (I’ll try to set up git send-email soon.) >> > Seems ok, except for this: > > gnu/packages/perl.scm:5946:5: perl-unicode-linebreak-2015.12: sentences > in description should be followed by two spaces; possible infraction

Re: [PATCH] Perl modules for HTML and XML

2015-12-23 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 12/23/2015 11:53 AM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > (I’ll try to set up git send-email soon.) > Seems ok, except for this: gnu/packages/perl.scm:5946:5: perl-unicode-linebreak-2015.12: sentences in description should be followed by two spaces; possible infraction at 104 Cyril.

[PATCH] Perl modules for HTML and XML

2015-12-23 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
(I’ll try to set up git send-email soon.) >From d4f5da65aaa55df2880b3a1aac7705973e5ae272 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo Wurmus Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:08:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/13] gnu: Add MIME::Charset. * gnu/packages/perl.scm (perl-mime-charset): New variable. --- gnu/packages

Re: bug#17468: Perl modules

2014-08-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Fixed in 3a09e1d, which will be in 0.8. Ludo’.

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andreas Enge skribis: > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 01:31:12PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> But there’s no tool that really “interprets” of what’s in the >> ‘description’ field[*]. What do you mean? >> [*] Actually, ‘fill-paragraph’ from (guix ui), which is used for the >> output of ‘guix pa

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Andreas Enge
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 01:31:12PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > But there’s no tool that really “interprets” of what’s in the > ‘description’ field[*]. What do you mean? > [*] Actually, ‘fill-paragraph’ from (guix ui), which is used for the > output of ‘guix package --search’ does some very

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Andreas Enge skribis: > Thanks for the comments, all implemented and pushed. Thanks! > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:54:02AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Also, two spaces after end-of-sentence periods. > > Just as a side note (side-note? sidenote?), in texinfo an end of sentence > period immed

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Andreas Enge
Thanks for the comments, all implemented and pushed. On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:54:02AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Also, two spaces after end-of-sentence periods. Just as a side note (side-note? sidenote?), in texinfo an end of sentence period immediately followed by a line break is interpre

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Ludovic Courtès
s, > unless these are already part of the official project name. But see > -@ref{Python Modules} for special rules concerning modules for > -the Python language. > +@ref{Python Modules} and @ref{Perl Modules} for special rules concerning > +modules for the Python and Perl languages. Shou

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Andreas Enge
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:20:33AM +0200, John Darrington wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > (I feel like starting a bikeshed discussion ;-).) > whichever, "bike shed" is two words. Ah, a German mistake! Andreas

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread John Darrington
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:56:38AM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:24:42PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > All very reasonable. Let us go for this (and I should add a section to the > packaging guidelines later on). Months later, here is a proposed patc

Re: Perl modules

2014-05-11 Thread Andreas Enge
what I learnt at school. (I feel like starting a bikeshed discussion ;-).) Andreas >From 97a3ac573edcb3046ee9655497a97bdf750090ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Enge Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 10:43:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: Add a section on perl modules in the packaging guideline

Re: Perl modules

2013-12-07 Thread Andreas Enge
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:56:17PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I would add the ‘perl-’ prefix, unless the package stands alone (for > instance, Hydra would be called ‘hydra’, not ‘perl-hydra’.) Yes, that would be as for python. > For the rest of the name, I would take the Perl module name. S

Re: Perl modules

2013-12-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
ed libwww-perl; > for libwww-perl, I need a lot of packages: Ouch. :-) > This leads me to the question: How should the packages containing perl > modules be named, and in which files should they be defined? > > So far, there are the following packages in xml.scm: > perl-xml-

Perl modules

2013-12-06 Thread Andreas Enge
packages containing perl modules be named, and in which files should they be defined? So far, there are the following packages in xml.scm: perl-xml-parser containing XML-Parser perl-xml-parser-perlsax containing libxml-perl perl-xml-simple containing XML-Simple The second one is definitely a misnomer; I