Timothy Sample writes:
> Hi,
>
> Robert Vollmert writes:
>
>> On 8. Aug 2019, at 15:12, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> I have one comment about the series: we've disabled tests on some
>>> packages that have been broken "forever" on i686. It would be better to
>>> do so selectively on just the affect
Hi,
Robert Vollmert writes:
> On 8. Aug 2019, at 15:12, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> I have one comment about the series: we've disabled tests on some
>> packages that have been broken "forever" on i686. It would be better to
>> do so selectively on just the affected architectures. I.e.:
>>
>> #:t
On 8. Aug 2019, at 15:12, Marius Bakke wrote:
> I have one comment about the series: we've disabled tests on some
> packages that have been broken "forever" on i686. It would be better to
> do so selectively on just the affected architectures. I.e.:
>
> #:tests? (if (string-prefix? "i686" (%c
Timothy Sample writes:
> Hi Robert and Marius,
>
> Marius Bakke writes:
>
>> Robert Vollmert writes:
>>
>>> Oh, I meant to ask:
>>>
>>> On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
>>>
I think it makes sense to wait for the core-updates merge (which
shouldn’t be too far out).
>>>
Hi Robert and Marius,
Marius Bakke writes:
> Robert Vollmert writes:
>
>> Oh, I meant to ask:
>>
>> On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
>>
>>> I think it makes sense to wait for the core-updates merge (which
>>> shouldn’t be too far out).
>>
>> Why? Shouldn’t substitutes be availa
Hi Robert,
I pushed my touched-up version of your branch to master! (See commits
a62ddb748f–caa366ec23.) Now I will enjoy closing all those patches. :)
I hope all my changes are okay. Besides the changes to “ghc-8.6”, I
mostly altered formatting, descriptions, and commit messages to better
fi
Robert Vollmert writes:
> Oh, I meant to ask:
>
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
>> Robert Vollmert writes:
>>
>>> Hi all, Timothy,
>>
>> Cool! I’m in the process of looking everything over. In the meantime,
>> I have some early questions and comments.
>>
>>> I’ve incorpor
Oh, I meant to ask:
On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
> Robert Vollmert writes:
>
>> Hi all, Timothy,
>
> Cool! I’m in the process of looking everything over. In the meantime,
> I have some early questions and comments.
>
>> I’ve incorporated your comments, and removed
>> ghc-
Hi Timothy,
> On 6. Aug 2019, at 06:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
>
>> #36663: adding elm compiler dependencies (just a few extra ghc
>> packages)
>
> These commits seem to be in the wrong order. I think I can untangle
> them, though.
>
>> #36692: GHC version 8.6.5 (just as a package for now, not
Hi Robert,
Robert Vollmert writes:
> Hi all, Timothy,
>
> On 25. Jul 2019, at 15:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
>> Other than that, LGTM. Thanks! (Do you have commit access now or
>> should I push these?)
>
> I do have commit access now, but for the moment I’m keeping to the
> branch wip-haskell-u
Hi all, Timothy,
On 25. Jul 2019, at 15:29, Timothy Sample wrote:
> Other than that, LGTM. Thanks! (Do you have commit access now or
> should I push these?)
I do have commit access now, but for the moment I’m keeping to the
branch wip-haskell-updates.
Thus, I’d ask you (or someone) to merge t
11 matches
Mail list logo
