Brett Gilio writes:
> Pierre Neidhardt writes:
>
>> That'd be awesome!
>
>
> Maybe i'm jumping the gun here. But once I get a working raco importer,
> would there be any objection to moving racket from scheme.scm to
> racket.scm, and subsequently placing rac
I guess that would make sense.
Another thing related to Racket is bug #33039 "Move DrRacket to a separate
output".
If you are interested :D
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> That'd be awesome!
Maybe i'm jumping the gun here. But once I get a working raco importer,
would there be any objection to moving racket from scheme.scm to
racket.scm, and subsequently placing raco derived imports in
racket-xyz.scm?
Brett Gilio
Hey all,
Has there been any discussion about creating a raco importer for Racket
packages? This might be something i'd be willing to look into if it is
both compliant with the needs of the upstream racket people, and if
others might use it.
Best,
Brett Gilio
