Re: (Geiser or guile bug) Guix-daemon output is missing

Alex Kost (2015-09-10 00:24 +0300) wrote: > Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-09 23:11 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost skribis: >> >>> As a workaround for this issue it was proposed¹ to transform >>> ‘current-build-output-port’ into a procedure (I have checked that it >>> solves the

Re: (Geiser or guile bug) Guix-daemon output is missing

Alex Kost skribis: > As a workaround for this issue it was proposed¹ to transform > ‘current-build-output-port’ into a procedure (I have checked that it > solves the problem). What do you think about it? Perhaps to make sure > that the port will be always the same define it

Re: (Geiser or guile bug) Guix-daemon output is missing

Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-09 23:11 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> As a workaround for this issue it was proposed¹ to transform >> ‘current-build-output-port’ into a procedure (I have checked that it >> solves the problem). What do you think about it? Perhaps to make

Re: (Geiser or guile bug) Guix-daemon output is missing

Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-07 00:28 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost skribis: > >> Now the bug itself: >> >> 1. Start Geiser (M-x run-guile) >> >> 2. Make a scheme buffer and evaluate (use-modules (guix scripts build)) >>there using "C-x C-e" or "C-M-x" (or any other