Katherine Cox-Buday writes:
> As we've seen these past years with COVID-19 and the world's supply
> chains, efficiency has some kind of inverse relationship with
> robustness. If you go too far down the path of efficiency, you are not
> very flexible, and you're building sand castles.
That's
Hi Konrad,
Similarly I found the post excellent.
Your focus regarding a transition from exploratory to robust is important
(though may have equal significance in the other direction?).
Would security experts have (understandable) criteria to prioritise choices for
'robust corridors' within an
Konrad Hinsen writes:
> What is so far insufficiently supported by computing technology is the
> necessary transition from "fast" to "robust".
This is really a large problem in the industry. Especially since in most
circles moving fast is considered the preferred way to do things. SaaS and
Hi Katherine and Ludo,
> I appreciate this post very much. Setting aside questions of freedom,
+1
> This is perhaps a rehash of the "worse is better"[2] conversation, but
> I often struggle with deciding whether to do things the "fast" way, or
> the "correct" way. I think when your path is
