Re: ‘version-1.2.0’ branch created!

2020-11-10 Thread zimoun
Dear, On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 13:52, zimoun wrote: > > Thoughts? Patches? Ideas? :-) > > A lot of substitutes are still missing (for example R). Is it possible > to trigger the builds? I think Ludo tried to trigger a rebuild of all the r-* packages, see [1]. However, "guix weather -c 15" sti

Re: ‘version-1.2.0’ branch created!

2020-11-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Oleg, Oleg Pykhalov skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > […] > >> Changes to core Guix should be limited to bug fixes as well. >> >> Thoughts? Patches? Ideas? :-) > > Could we have a shepherd with 5082354a included (service: Add > #:supplementary-groups.)? I could live with an override

Re: ‘version-1.2.0’ branch created!

2020-11-07 Thread Oleg Pykhalov
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: […] > Changes to core Guix should be limited to bug fixes as well. > > Thoughts? Patches? Ideas? :-) Could we have a shepherd with 5082354a included (service: Add #:supplementary-groups.)? I could live with an overrided shepherd package [1] which contains 508235

Re: ‘version-1.2.0’ branch created!

2020-11-06 Thread Julien Lepiller
Le 6 novembre 2020 07:51:30 GMT-05:00, zimoun a écrit : >Hi, > >On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 at 11:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> We have a new branch now! > >Awesome! > > >> This branch should take primarily important changes that fix the >> installer or other key elements. It should not change tra

Re: ‘version-1.2.0’ branch created!

2020-11-06 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 at 11:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > We have a new branch now! Awesome! > This branch should take primarily important changes that fix the > installer or other key elements. It should not change translatable > strings and should not change the manual either, unless a fi