Re: Teams: please add yourself to etc/teams.scm.in

2022-07-03 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, Am Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 03:04:36PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > etc/teams.scm.in is now part of the repository. The configure script > generates the executable etc/teams.scm. > Please feel free to add yourself to teams in that file by adding a > definition like this: thanks for

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-07-01 Thread Leo Famulari
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 05:21:11PM +0200, zimoun wrote: > * Kernel > > + Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Feel free to add my name to the kernel team. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-07-01 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 12:28 +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> [...] >> An example: >> >>    ./pre-inst-env guile --no-auto-compile -l etc/teams.scm -c '(cc r >> core)' >> >> This prints “git send-email” arguments to Cc members of the R and >> Core >>

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-07-01 Thread Liliana Marie Prikler
Am Freitag, dem 01.07.2022 um 12:28 +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > [...] > An example: > >    ./pre-inst-env guile --no-auto-compile -l etc/teams.scm -c '(cc r > core)' > > This prints “git send-email” arguments to Cc members of the R and > Core > teams when a patch is received by Debbugs. > >

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-07-01 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Now the question is merely how to represent and present this. It’s not >> a bad idea to have the team associations in the repository so that we >> can present the data on the website and also use it with our tools to >> notify the right

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread b...@bokr.com
On +2022-06-22 09:56:14 +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:21:15AM +0200, zimoun wrote: > > On Tuesday, 21 June 2022, wrote: > > > > > On +2022-06-21 17:21:11 +0200, zimoun wrote: > > > > > > > > Here below a collection of answers. The teams are more or less. Maybe, > >

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread Blake Shaw
Hi y'all, This looks great, thanks for putting in the work! Im getting back into the Guile + Guix documentation, and realize its a subject the @whereiseveryone and others are also working on, and thus it could probably use a concentrated team of its own. What do others think? Best, Blake On

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Now the question is merely how to represent and present this. It’s not > a bad idea to have the team associations in the repository so that we > can present the data on the website and also use it with our tools to > notify the right people. Mathieu suggested

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread Maxime Devos
Josselin Poiret schreef op wo 22-06-2022 om 14:30 [+0200]: > Hello, > > zimoun writes: > > Then maybe, we could hook Mumi and add regexps based on commit messages > > for notifying a specific team.  Well, it is a rough approximation with > > many false-positive but hey the aim is to deal with

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hello, zimoun writes: > Then maybe, we could hook Mumi and add regexps based on commit messages > for notifying a specific team. Well, it is a rough approximation with > many false-positive but hey the aim is to deal with patches so these > false-positive do not matter, IMHO. Maybe we could

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread zimoun
Hi Ricardo, On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 09:59, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I also wonder about how / if we should notify teams about relevant > patches. Will contributors Cc the relevant teams or will we have team > predicates, e.g. a procedure that spits out the appropriate teams when > given a patch?

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Hi simon, > Here below a collection of answers. The teams are more or less. Maybe, > we could join some for having another structure. WDYT? Thank you for the initiative! I had been meaning to go through the whole thread and collect and organize all submissions, but you’ve done all the work

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-22 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 12:21:15AM +0200, zimoun wrote: > On Tuesday, 21 June 2022, wrote: > > > On +2022-06-21 17:21:11 +0200, zimoun wrote: > > > > > > Here below a collection of answers. The teams are more or less. Maybe, > > > we could join some for having another structure. WDYT? > > > >

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-21 Thread zimoun
On Tuesday, 21 June 2022, wrote: > On +2022-06-21 17:21:11 +0200, zimoun wrote: > > > > Here below a collection of answers. The teams are more or less. Maybe, > > we could join some for having another structure. WDYT? > > Where is the RISC/MES team? :) > Embeded / Bootstrap ;-)

Re: Teams: first draft list

2022-06-21 Thread bokr
On +2022-06-21 17:21:11 +0200, zimoun wrote: > > Here below a collection of answers. The teams are more or less. Maybe, > we could join some for having another structure. WDYT? Where is the RISC/MES team? :)

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-16 Thread Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
caton...@gmail.com writes: I asked for indications about the process (what magic to use in the REPL) My experience with Guix, in general, is that the REPL isn't particularly useful for any task beyond very simple testing (eg, what are the contents of ‘%base-services’). It's a shame, but

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-16 Thread Maxime Devos
Blake Shaw schreef op do 16-06-2022 om 06:20 [+0700]: > But, perhaps it's just getting late and the matters are now & the > details are slipping my mind, but im starting to realize im unsure of > many examples of file-like objects that aren't a file? The email > where you responded re: packages

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-16 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
caton...@gmail.com writes: > Ricardo, the general map of the concepts involved in conceiving a > service is useful > > But in my toot I asked for something different > > I asked for indications about the process (what magic to use in the > REPL) There is no REPL magic. I write the service in

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread catonano
Il giorno mer, 15/06/2022 alle 17.01 +, Blake Shaw ha scritto: > > Catonano: > I think writing a home-service is much easier given that you don't > need to do produce an entire system generation before you find out > what you did wrong;  I suspected something like this This is why I

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Blake Shaw
Thanks for the feedback, abelian groups are a good example because so many groups are abelian (fields etc). But, perhaps it's just getting late and the matters are now & the details are slipping my mind, but im starting to realize im unsure of many examples of file-like objects that aren't a

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Maxime Devos
Blake Shaw schreef op wo 15-06-2022 om 21:40 [+]: > On the contrary, lets say I'm writing an intro book on CT. If I'm > demonstrating something trivial, say the initial object, I'm not > going to refer to it as "an initial-like object" for the sake of > generality. Neither does Guix? If

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Maxime Devos
Blake Shaw schreef op wo 15-06-2022 om 21:40 [+]: > > AFAIK no relation to GNU. > > I thought recalled hearing it used in relation to GNU/Linux. A quick > search > brings up this stackexchange discussion[1], which quotes the book > "Linux > Philosophy" with the following: > > #+begin_example

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Maxime Devos
Blake Shaw schreef op wo 15-06-2022 om 21:40 [+]: > > Something I dislike about the ‘file AND file-like objects’ > > construction > > is that it suggests that files and file-like objects are separate > > and > > are handled separately, whereas files (as in, 'local-file' or > > 'computed-file')

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Maxime Devos
Blake Shaw schreef op wo 15-06-2022 om 17:01 [+]: > Thats very good advice and will be a useful guide in refactoring the > parts of the system services documentation. I think in general, we > need to find a nice middle ground between the extremely general and > the immediately sensible, as I

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Blake Shaw
Ricardo: Thats very good advice and will be a useful guide in refactoring the parts of the system services documentation. I think in general, we need to find a nice middle ground between the extremely general and the immediately sensible, as I remember when I first got into guix 1.5 years ago,

Re: how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
caton...@gmail.com writes: > Il giorno mer, 15/06/2022 alle 01.52 +0700, Blake Shaw ha scritto: >> >> I found the documentation to be a bit confusing (understandably, as >> its new), but once the workflow snapped together its been amazing to >> see how easy it is to create new services.  > >

how to write services (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread catonano
Il giorno mer, 15/06/2022 alle 01.52 +0700, Blake Shaw ha scritto: > > I found the documentation to be a bit confusing (understandably, as > its new), but once the workflow snapped together its been amazing to > see how easy it is to create new services.  This is something I'm specifically

How to write a service (was: Re: Teams)

2022-06-15 Thread catonano
Il giorno mer, 15/06/2022 alle 01.52 +0700, Blake Shaw ha scritto: > > I found the documentation to be a bit confusing (understandably, as > its new), but once the workflow snapped together its been amazing to > see how easy it is to create new services.  I'm specifically interested in this

Re: Teams

2022-06-14 Thread jgart
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 08:47:37 -0400 guix-devel-requ...@gnu.org wrote: Hi Guixers, Count me in for any packaging on teams. I'd like to help out with python and/or rust. all best, jgart

Re: Teams

2022-06-14 Thread Blake Shaw
I think I could join the Home team as well, at least for now, as I started using it a month ago and have been having a blast. I also have some home-services to upstream after a bit of polish (Guile EDSL for Herbstluftwm configuration if anyone is interested), and some plans to work on the

Re: Teams

2022-06-14 Thread Andrew Tropin
On 2022-06-05 10:19, Josselin Poiret wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email >> aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. > > I think an installer team would be good too (which I would gladly

Re: Teams

2022-06-13 Thread raingloom
I'd definitely love to see an A/V or graphics production team, making Guix more suitable for artists has been on my TODO list for a while, even made some tentative steps towards packaging Blender addons. Personally, I'd love to help out with testing and/or developing Blender stuff. On Mon, 13 Jun

Re: Teams

2022-06-13 Thread Blake Shaw
Hi folks, I'm just getting back to the list after finishing a gig, but want to raise my hand to join both the scheme team and perhaps something like an A/V team if folks think that would be a desirable team to put together. I think an A/V team would look after: #+begin_example scheme (gnu

Re: Teams

2022-06-09 Thread Arun Isaac
Hi Guix, I like the idea of teams. And, it's nice to see so many volunteers raise their hands! > * Rust team > Efraim Flashner > Aleksandr Vityazev > Arun Isaac > John Soo > Maxim Cournoyer > Nicolas Goaziou > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice However, I know very little about Rust, and I'm not a good

Re: Teams

2022-06-08 Thread Eric Bavier
Hi, On Sun, 2022-06-05 at 11:51 +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: > Hello, > > Am Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 02:07:15PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams.  > > Here’s > > a

Re: Teams

2022-06-08 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
Hello, Ludovic Courtès writes: > Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > >> On 2022-06-04, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >>> As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email >>> aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. Here’s >>> a draft of three teams: >> >> I'm almost

Re: Teams

2022-06-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > On 2022-06-04, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email >> aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. Here’s >> a draft of three teams: > > I'm almost afraid to volunteer... but maybe architecture

Re: Teams

2022-06-07 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2022-06-04, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. Here’s > a draft of three teams: I'm almost afraid to volunteer... but maybe architecture specific teams? If I were to put my

Re: Teams

2022-06-07 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 11:51:20AM +0200, zimoun wrote: > Hi Ricardo, > > > > * R team > > Simon Tournier > > Ricardo Wurmus > > In addition, add me to: > > * Julia team I can do the Julia team too. -- Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D

Re: Teams

2022-06-06 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 02:50:49PM +, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >> I think we should also have (natural) language 'teams' who can be >> pinged when, e.g., a news item lands, through a single >> guix-translators@ meta-alias, and who can co-ordinate

Re: Teams

2022-06-06 Thread Ryan Prior
On Saturday, June 4th, 2022 at 12:07 PM, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > let’s add a page to the website that lists teams > and a mail alias for each of the teams That sounds great. What do you think about encouraging each team to write a dedicated intro to Guix from the perspective of that team as

Re: Teams

2022-06-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Mathieu Othacehe skribis: > I would suggest to extend a bit the scope of this idea. What about > creating an etc/tutors.scm file as the one attached. > > This way people would run something like: > > git send-email $(get-tutors.scm HEAD^^) *.patches Nice idea, I like that! To get the ball

Re: Teams

2022-06-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi! Josselin Poiret skribis: > WDYT of the following teams: > * Installer (which I'd gladly join); > * System; > * Home; > * Internals? I think these are good ideas. Count me on the System, Home, and Internals/Core teams! Ludo’.

Re: Teams

2022-06-06 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus writes: [...] > * Rust team [...] > Maxim Cournoyer [...] I don't think I'm specially fit for Rust packaging (I have little experience/interest in packaging *apps/libraries* with it -- I've only looked into shortening the Rust bootstrap out of necessity :-)). I'd

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread Mathieu Othacehe
Hello Ricardo, I would suggest to extend a bit the scope of this idea. What about creating an etc/tutors.scm file as the one attached. This way people would run something like: --8<---cut here---start->8--- git send-email $(get-tutors.scm HEAD^^) *.patches

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread indieterminacy
FWIW, I just want to commend whoever is packaging TexLive. My last update covered March of this year - no mean feat given that it is a 3.4GB package aggregate. (sorry I cant do more direct contributions for Guix atm, looking forward to such an honour eventually) On 04-06-2022 14:07,

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread Julien Lepiller
If we make a team per build system, I'd be in ant, maven, ocaml and dune :) I think there was also interest in formal methods, it could be a team. On June 5, 2022 11:51:20 AM GMT+02:00, zimoun wrote: >Hi Ricardo, > >On Sat, 04 Jun 2022 at 14:07, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> As a first step I’d

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread zimoun
Hi Ricardo, On Sat, 04 Jun 2022 at 14:07, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. Here’s > a draft of three teams: Well, a team per build system would fit more or less the needs,

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello, Am Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 02:07:15PM +0200 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. Here’s > a draft of three teams: if something like this makes sense, I would be interested

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread Lars-Dominik Braun
Hi Ricardo, > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. Here’s > a draft of three teams: * Python Team Lars-Dominik Braun * Haskell Team Lars-Dominik Braun Anyone interested to join these with me?

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
On Sat, Jun 04, 2022 at 02:50:49PM +, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > I think we should also have (natural) language 'teams' who can be > pinged when, e.g., a news item lands, through a single > guix-translators@ meta-alias, and who can co-ordinate before > releases. If we do so, please add me

Re: Teams

2022-06-05 Thread Josselin Poiret
Hello everyone, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams. I think an installer team would be good too (which I would gladly join). WDYT of the following teams: * Installer (which

Re: Teams

2022-06-04 Thread david larsson
On 4 June 2022 12:07:15 UTC, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: * Rust team [...] Tobias Geerinckx-Rice OK what the hell. Would you wanna create and be the Bash team person as well? :) Best regards, David

Re: Teams

2022-06-04 Thread Maxime Devos
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice schreef op za 04-06-2022 om 14:50 [+]: > I think we should also have (natural) language 'teams' who can be pinged > when, e.g., a news item lands, through a single guix-translators@ meta-alias, > and who can co-ordinate before releases. > > I'll take -nl.  Maxime? Ok

Re: Teams

2022-06-04 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
On 4 June 2022 12:07:15 UTC, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >* Rust team [...] >Tobias Geerinckx-Rice OK what the hell. I'll also join Leo on a kernel/module/initrd team if they're interested. I think we should also have (natural) language 'teams' who can be pinged when, e.g., a news item lands,

Re: Teams

2022-06-04 Thread Ekaitz Zarraga
> Hi Guix, > > this is not a new idea[1]: let’s add a page to the website that lists teams > and a mail alias for each of the teams. > > For example, the “R team” consists of people familiar with how R > packaging works in Guix, e.g. Simon and myself. There would be an alias >

Re: Teams

2022-06-04 Thread Maxime Devos
Ricardo Wurmus schreef op za 04-06-2022 om 14:07 [+0200]: > As a first step I’d suggest collecting teams, setting up the email > aliases, and updating the website to show the existing teams.  Here’s > a draft of three teams: > > [...] You can add me to the Rust team and to a new Minetest team.